MARGARET Ferrier is expected to be suspended from the House of Commons for 30 days on Thursday with MPs set to vote on whether to approve the punishment.
At around 5pm, parliamentarians will decide whether to approve the recommendation of the Standards Committee to suspend Ferrier for having “knowingly and recklessly exposed members of the public and those on the parliamentary estate to the risk of contracting Covid-19”.
If approved, Ferrier's suspension will begin on Friday, May 26.
The MP has already been convicted for travelling from London to Scotland despite having tested positive for the coronavirus. She was handed 270 hours of community service on September 13, 2022.
READ MORE: Labour by-election candidate shielded from media amid claims of 'stitch up'
If MPs do as expected and approve the 30-day suspension from the Commons it will pave the way to a by-election in her Rutherglen and Hamilton West constituency.
A total of 10% of her constituents will need to sign a recall petition in order to trigger such a ballot. While that has not happened in Scotland before, Labour will be deploying activists in the area in a bid to get the required numbers in the six-week window.
People will not be able to add their names to the petition online, but will have to attend signing stations set up across the area by the Petitions Officer in South Lanarkshire.
Party’s are allowed to spend up to £10,000 on the petition, and Labour have said they will be spending up to the limit.
While the SNP have yet to announce who they will stand in the by-election, Labour have nominated Michael Shanks, who has previously failed in bids to win a seat for the party at Holyrood in the Glasgow Kelvin area and at Westminster in Glasgow North West.
There have been allegations of a “stitch-up” in the area, with Shanks – seen as the leadership’s favourite – having been picked over popular local councillors.
The by-election will be a test for both Labour and the SNP, with polls suggesting that Keir Starmer’s party are gaining ground they are widely expected to win the seat.
There had been suggestions that Conservatives may look to reduce Ferrier’s suspension to nine days, below the 10-day threshold at which a recall petition is triggered, in an effort to avoid setting a precedent ahead of any punishment which former prime minister Boris Johnson may be recommended by the Standards Committee.
Allan Dorans, the SNP MP on the committee, had also backed a nine-day suspension.
Ferrier, then an SNP MP, developed Covid symptoms on September 26, 2020 – a Saturday – and took a test, but still went to church and had lunch with a family member the following day.
On the Monday, while awaiting the result of the test, she travelled by train to London, took part in a Commons debate and ate in the Members’ Tearoom in Parliament.
That evening she received a text telling her the test was positive. But instead of isolating, she travelled back to Scotland by train the following morning.
READ MORE: BBC presenter called out for 'unbelievable' Margaret Ferrier error
Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards Daniel Greenberg said Ferrier had breached the code of conduct for MPs “by placing her own personal interest of not wishing to self-isolate immediately or in London over the public interest of avoiding possible risk of harm to health and life”.
She also breached the code because “her actions commencing from when she first took a Covid-19 test to when she finally begins self-isolation have caused significant damage to the reputation and integrity of the House of Commons as a whole, and of its members generally”.
The Commons Standards Committee found she “acted dishonestly” by misleading the SNP’s chief whip, and added: “Ms Ferrier’s actions knowingly and recklessly exposed members of the public and those on the parliamentary estate to the risk of contracting Covid-19 and demonstrated a disregard for the parliamentary and national guidance in place.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel