ASH Regan has said waiting for support for Scottish independence to reach 60% is “mental”, as she admitted having concerns about the party’s direction.
The former SNP leadership candidate was speaking to the Through A Scottish Prism podcast – hosted by pro-independence blogger and senior Alba Party member Roddy MacLeod, who goes by the name Barrhead Boy.
She said: “This idea that they (the SNP) were putting forward last week that we just keep working away and playing by the rules and we just try to get support up to 60% and they (the UK Government) will just do what we want.
“I fundamentally think that’s mental, and that is not going to work.”
READ MORE: Scottish independence support at 53 per cent, new poll finds
It is unclear which comments made last week were being referenced by Regan.
During the leadership campaign, First Minister Humza Yousaf pledged to drive up support for independence, conceding the “settled will” was not yet there, but he shied away from putting a figure on the level of support he wanted to see.
Edinburgh Eastern MSP Regan went on to say the SNP should become more “belligerent” and “aggressive” in its campaigning for independence.
Asked if the party is close to “getting back on track” as it relates to independence, Regan said: “I’m quite concerned about where we are right now.
“It doesn’t have to be terminal, I think we need to change the way we’re doing things in certain areas.
“I believe we can look, we should look, at the last eight years and learn from what’s gone before.
“That doesn’t mean you do everything totally different, but you have to look at it, analyse it and think ‘what worked and what didn’t work?’ “Doing things the same just because we did them the same before isn’t going to work.”
Regan added she is “sensing” anger and frustration from current party members and those who have recently left the party.
The independence convention the SNP is staging next month, Regan added, must be an event which allows members to speak freely and decide on a way forward for the movement.
“I think it’s right that we have a conference, and it is a conference, it isn’t anything else… to discuss the independence strategy,” she said.
“But at that conference we should be talking about everything, and everyone should be entitled to speak and we should be able to debate different ideas and then see what comes out of that.
“I’m concerned that it looks like we’re only going to be allowed to talk about one strategy, which is the referendum strategy, which I think has run out of road now and we should be moving on from that.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel