Good evening, my name is James and welcome to the new weekly newsletter focusing on the highest Branch Office in the land.
The sixth free newsletter is below for you to have a read of as I bring you the week's latest news and gaffes from Scottish Labour, as they attempt to challenge the SNP/Green Government and avoid being disciplined by head honcho Keir Starmer.
As always, thanks for reading The National. Make sure you don't miss our latest subscription deals. Click here for more information.
If you have anything you'd like to see from the newsletter, just get in touch at james.walker@newsquest.co.uk
Hope you enjoy!
New Blue Labour
You may have noticed that this week’s newsletter image is blue rather than the archetypal Labour red.
Why you may ask? Well – If it wasn’t already abundantly obvious, the Labour Party under head honcho Keir Starmer is becoming increasingly indistinguishable from the Tories.
Don’t just take my word for it.
On Saturday, Starmer himself told the press ahead of a speech that he “doesn’t care” if he sounded conservative when committing to preserving “precious things in our way of life”.
Those “precious things” Anas Sarwar’s boss speaks of must be Tory legislation, as his party continues to refuse to back repealing any of it.
The latest iteration of this new blue Labour came on Tuesday after they refused to support the SNP’s efforts to repeal anti-protest legislation – calling their attempt “a stunt”.
The Public Order Act – which gives police in England sweeping powers to crack down on peaceful protest – was hastily rushed in ahead of the King’s coronation whereupon its powers were used to arrest dozens of anti-monarchy protesters for, um, protesting.
In response to this refusal, the SNP criticised Labour and accused the party of “simply looking like gormless Tory sidekicks”.
Following Starmer’s aforementioned speech, Humza Yousaf joined in on the comparison and tweeted: “This week, I accused Labour of being a pale imitation of the Tories, I was wrong, they are a replica.
“Whether it is the blue Tories or red Tories in Number 10, they will continue policies that are harming Scotland. We need independence to protect our people.”
Tea room > cost of living debate
Labour faced criticism after not a single one of their backbench MPs put themselves forward to speak in a debate on the cost of living on Tuesday – with accusations they were sitting in the tea room instead.
SNP’s deputy leader Mhairi Black opened the debate, saying the cost of living crisis was the result of a UK Government which “shamed the sick and disabled”.
At the beginning of her speech, she also noted: “As far as I’m aware there is only one Conservative MP wanting to talk and not a single Labour backbencher wanting to talk on this.”
Cries of “they don’t care” could be heard from the SNP backbenches. SNP MP Peter Grant then later tweeted: “Astonishing that there’s not a single Labour backbench MP who has put their name down to speak in a debate on the cost of living.
“And it’s not because they’re busy elsewhere, there’s dozens of them in the tea room.”
Former FM chimes in
Labour Branch Office leader Anas Sarwar has been notably absent this week, erring away from commenting on the above – a wise move perhaps from his comms team.
In his place, former Labour first minister Henry McLeish chimed in with some sense and branded Westminster’s behaviour towards the Scottish Parliament as an “assault on devolution” in a scathing interview.
First minister between 2000 and 2001, McLeish called out the “political control and coercion” of the UK Government amid moves to suppress Scotland’s engagement with foreign representatives.
McLeish - who says he'll back independence if the Union isn't reformed - also said Scottish Secretary Alister Jack should resign if he can’t stand up for Scotland against Westminster’s efforts to curb Holyrood’s international work.
Guidance, issued last month by Foreign Secretary James Cleverly, states that meetings between the Scottish Government and overseas ministers need to go through the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.
Cleverly expressed fears over the Scottish Government promoting “separatism” or undermining Westminster policy during the meetings.
Shortly after, Tory peer and MP hopeful Lord Frost called for Scottish devolution to be reversed.
McLeish hit out against the UK Government’s actions in an interview with The Herald.
He said: "This letter is part of a wider assault on devolution. It's the contempt, the disrespect, but it's also about political control and coercion. This Tory government does not recognise the spirit of devolution.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel