AN SNP backbench rebel has hit back over suggestions he should be disciplined for raucous and dramatic protests over Scottish Government policy.
Former minister Fergus Ewing was harshly criticised in a “polemic” by former SNP spin doctor Murray Foote, who called on Humza Yousaf and the party’s high command to crack down on the MSP’s protests.
The Inverness MSP, who quit as rural affairs secretary after bullying allegations were levelled against him, made headlines earlier this month when he ripped up the Government’s plans for a highly controversial fishing ban to protect the environment.
Writing in the Daily Record, Foote – who edited the paper at the time it published the infamous “Vow” front page – suggested Ewing, son of Winnie, was in “the throes of a 24-month huff since he left the Government”.
READ MORE: SNP MSP Fergus Ewing rips up HPMA plan in Holyrood chamber
He added: “Or perhaps he believes, as a son of the venerated Ewing dynasty, his surname entitles him to behave as he chooses, free of consequence. If so, it’s time he was dissuaded of the notion.
“If Ewing is continually let off the hook, others will believe they too can act with impunity – and that again only benefits the opposition.”
But Ewing hit back at the attack, saying Foote was playing “the man not the ball” and adding: “He can carry on with his polemics. I’ll carry on speaking up for Scotland.”
Ewing said: “I was elected, and then on five occasions re-elected, to represent my constituents and to stand up for Scotland.
“That’s what I try to do to the best of my ability. I make no apology for campaigning for hard-working Scots and putting people first.
“I’ve campaigned for our fisherman and oil and gas workers for fifty years and value the work they do for Scotland. I’ll continue to do that.
“For 50 years the SNP has stood up for our fishermen and we must continue to do so. Likewise for nearly 50 years we’ve argued that Scotland must use our own resources including oil and gas. This week a poll showed a huge majority of Scot’s continue to hold that view.
“I’m campaigning for the dualling of the A9 and A96 where we have, I’m afraid, not delivered yet on our pledges.
READ MORE: Murray Foote resigns as SNP communications chief after membership row
“Mr Foote chooses not to mention any of these policies long-standing planks of SNP campaigns. Instead, he makes an entirely personal attack.
“In my experience of politics, he who plays the man not the ball does so because he’s losing the game and the debate.
“In fact, he hasn’t even tried to argue a case. He can carry on with his polemics. I’ll carry on speaking up for Scotland.”
In the Record piece, Foote suggests the party leadership could “wipe clean the slate of recent misdemeanours and start over with the warning that future serious breaches will be met with equally serious consequences”.
But he warned: “Time needs to be called on the behaviour of politicians who mistakenly believe they are bigger than the party.
“The clock is ticking.”
Foote left his position as the SNP’s head of communications after he gave the media misleading information about the party’s membership during the leadership race.
An SNP spokesperson said: “SNP MSPs are fully focussed on delivering for the people of Scotland in the midst of a Tory cost of living crisis and damaging Brexit backed by Labour.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel