FORMER Scottish Tory leader Ruth Davidson has said that Alex Salmond’s move back into frontline politics “comforts” her because he puts off more voters than he inspires.
In a column for The Times, the Conservative peer took particular aim at the Alba leader after he spoke at a rally for independence in Glasgow on Saturday.
Salmond used the rally, held at the same time as the King’s coronation in London, to call for all pro-independence parties to stand under a single banner at the next General Election.
But Davidson claimed that the former first minister’s involvement was a boon to the Unionists due to his unpopularity in the polls.
READ MORE: New think tank on Scotland's economics launches – as poll shows appetite for change
The former Scots Tory leader wrote: “If it quickened the pulse of the disputed number of watchers, it gladdened the heart of everyone who cares about keeping the UK together because there is a reason the more sensible elements of the SNP have been erasing Salmond from their shared political history to the point of almost making him an unperson.”
In response, an Alba spokesperson called Davidson's arguments "vacuous", saying that Davidson feared the return of Salmond as a credible voice for Scottish independence.
Elsewhere in the column, Davidson highlighted how all three SNP leadership candidates – Ash Regan, Humza Yousaf, and Kate Forbes – had initially pledged to speak at the All Under One Banner rally. However, after Yousaf accepted an invitation to the ceremony in London and Forbes pulled out sick, only Regan actually spoke.
“In truth, no one at the top of the SNP could credibly have headlined the event,” Davidson claimed. “This was for a group of people who want – indeed, need – to believe that independence is coming and in short order, too.”
She argued that “the true believers have forgiven all sins”, but polling suggests that Salmond is actually deeply unpopular with the Scottish public.
“A regular tracker poll of Scottish political attitudes by Savanta shows Salmond’s approval ratings are catastrophically dismal at -47,” Davidson wrote in The Times. “Compared with his two successors – [Nicola] Sturgeon on +10 and Yousaf on -12 – he is clearly a terrible choice as the face and voice of the grassroots nationalist movement.
“If he were capable of public wounding, it would cut Salmond deep to know he’s almost doubly as unpopular in Scotland as the supposedly ‘hated’ Conservative prime minister he often rails against.
“I fought hard to keep the UK together during the referendum campaign and still believe in our shared future. The idea of Salmond using SNP disarray as an opportunity to re-enter the stage comforts me politically because, for every die-hard he inspires, he puts off a handful of wavering voters.
“There is something queasy, though, about watching some rehabilitate this self-styled ‘no angel’ so quickly and comprehensibly. Even if he is an auld bruiser.”
READ MORE: 'I'm not going anywhere': Independence Minister's defiant response to Alister Jack
An Alba Party spokesperson said: “Baroness Davidson’s vacuous column drips a mixture of malice and fear. Malice because when Alex was first minister her leadership of the Tories in Scotland never got her anywhere except weekly humiliations at First Minsters Questions.
"Fear because just as the SNP is engulfed in problems the last thing Unionists want to see is the re-emergence of a credible voice for Scottish independence. Having to wheel out a superannuated Tory peer is a sign of that panic since their current leader is hardly up to the job.
"Alex of course did not re-enter the political stage on Saturday but by the hard yards of 54 public meetings on independence in communities the length and breadth of Scotland over the last year. That is why support for Alex and Alba is now rising and rising fast.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel