THE First Minister has been accused of “wasting” the Scottish Parliament’s time with a debate to celebrate the King’s coronation.
Humza Yousaf tabled a motion in his name – backed by Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross – to commemorate the coronation of King Charles at the weekend.
Alba said there was “no reason whatsoever for him to be wasting parliamentary time paying further homage” to the monarch.
And the Greens shared a similar sentiment, with a spokesperson saying: “It is a waste of parliamentary time. Our views on the Monarchy are well known.”
Yousaf attended Saturday’s event in Westminster Abbey along with former SNP Westminster leader Ian Blackford.
The party faced criticism from Alex Salmond for attending, who instead addressed a pro-independence rally in Glasgow organised by All Under One Banner.
READ MORE: 'Do you want a sensible conversation?': Republic leader clashes with Kay Burley
During the short discussion in Holyrood on Tuesday, Yousaf was the only party leader who spoke in the debate not to say the phrase “God save the King”.
But Neale Hanvey, Alba’s Westminster leader, accused the FM of “fawning” over the royal family.
He said: “Humza Yousaf’s government should be focused on delivering Scotland’s independence as an urgent and immediate priority.
“As First Minister, he attended the coronation to represent the whole nation, but it was his choice to swear an oath of allegiance to King Charles on Saturday and there is no reason whatsoever for him to be wasting parliamentary time paying further homage to a King whilst people across energy-rich Scotland are living in poverty.
“The Alba Party believe the best choice for Scotland’s future is as an independent republic and we urge the Scottish Government to spend less time fawning over the royals in London and more time delivering self-determination to our people and our nation.”
The First Minister’s office was approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel