CHARLES Mountbatten-Windsor has waited seven long decades to be crowned as King.
It is a role that he has waited to occupy longer than any other heir in British history, having waited since his late mother acceded to the throne in 1952 when he was just three years old.
In other words, he’s had plenty of time to notch up a few scandals. And we have compiled a list of some of the most memorable for you.
Behold: King Charles’s biggest scandals…
Tampongate
It may be the scandal most associated with Charles, and was even dramatised on the last season of The Crown.
Tampongate refers to a private phone conversation between Charles and Camilla Parker-Bowles which happened in 1989, when they were both still married to their respective spouses.
A full transcript of the call was later leaked to the press three months after Charles and Princess Diana had formally separated in 1993.
There was full audio too, thanks to an amateur radio enthusiast who stumbled upon the chat.
A lot of the conversation centred on how they would next meet at a friend’s house.
But what really got people talking was a segment of the conversation where Charles told his then-mistress he wished he could be reincarnated as a tampon so he could live inside her.
Parker-Bowles said in response: “You are a complete idiot! Oh, what a wonderful idea.”
Tampongate tanked Charles’ popularity— a poll at the time found 42 per cent of people thought Prince William should directly succeed his grandmother.
According to a memoir by Princess Diana’s ex-bodyguard, she said “Game, set and match” when she first saw the story in a tabloid.
Politically neutral?
Given the UK is a constitutional monarchy, the royal family is supposed to be politically neutral and shouldn’t get involved with policy-making decisions.
However, Charles appeared to overstep with a series of policy demands in the form of letters to the then-UK prime minister Tony Blair in the early 2000s.
This included a call to improve equipment for troops fighting in Iraq, as well as the availability of alternative herbal medicines in the UK.
A spokesperson for the then-prince said he was just expressing "concern about issues that he has raised in public," according to The Guardian.
Cash for knighthood scheme
In February 2022, the police launched an investigation into Charles' charity, The Prince's Trust.
The Sunday Times reported that the now King’s close aide, Michael Fawcett, offered a Saudi tycoon a knighthood in exchange for £1.5 million in donations.
The publication reported that Saudi businessman Mahfouz Marei Mubarak bin Mahfouz paid tens of thousands of dollars to fixers.
They said this could lead to him being awarded an honorary CBE — the highest-ranking Order of the British Empire award for those who are not UK citizens.
Bin Laden family donation
Speaking of donations, Charles can’t have thought this would have been received well.
In 2022, it was revealed that he had accepted a payment of £1m from the family of Osama Bin Laden.
The Sunday Times reported at the time that the Prince of Wales's Charitable Fund (PWCF) received the money from two of Osama Bin Laden's half-brothers in 2013, two years after the al-Qaeda leader was killed.
Charles also took the money despite objections from advisers at Clarence House and PWCF, according to the Sunday Times, citing multiple sources.
Bin Laden was disowned by his family in 1994 and there is no evidence that his half-brothers had links to his activities.
But still, speak of a PR nightmare!
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here