HUMZA Yousaf has said no one should be “in any doubt” about his commitment to implementing buffer zones around abortion clinics in Scotland after a Government working group was scrapped.
Pro-choice campaigners have slated a decision to axe the ministerial working group on safe access zones ahead of Green MSP Gillian Mackay’s bill being formally introduced to Parliament.
Back Off Scotland said it was an “ill thought-out and premature” move, while the co-founders suggested they had been “kept in the dark” about the progress of the bill.
But speaking to The National on Wednesday at an anti-poverty summit in Edinburgh, the First Minister insisted he remained supportive of the legislation and the scrapping of the group was not a sign of the Government rolling back on the issue.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf replies to Alex Salmond's Stone of Destiny stand-off call
Asked about Back Off Scotland suggesting the Government were not taking buffer zones seriously, Yousaf said: “That’s simply not the case.
“I’ve been very unequivocal in my articulation around why we need safe access zones, I did so and said so during the course of the election contest and anybody who doubts otherwise I hope will be reassured by the fact I’m First Minister and I absolutely believe in introducing those safe access zones as quick as we possibly can.
“We’ve got to make sure they’re legally watertight and we’ll work with Gillian Mackay to ensure that’s hopefully the case.”
Back Off Scotland highlighted on social media that the push to protect women accessing abortion care from harassment started 20 years ago when a question on the matter was put to the Government by Carolyn Leckie of the Scottish Socialist Party.
She asked what plans there were to ensure women can access pregnancy termination services “free from harassment by anti-abortion campaigners”.
The Scottish Government have recently come under fire for not taking a lead on Mackay’s members bill, including from former MLA Clare Bailey who introduced the legislation in Northern Ireland.
Bailey insisted the Scottish Government needed to “pull the finger out” after the Supreme Court unanimously agreed her safe access zones bill was legally sound and did not interfere with human rights before Christmas.
The working group involved the likes of former women's health minister Maree Todd, represenatives from Scotland's councils and COSLA [Convention of Scottish Local Authorities], Police Scotland, Government officials and NHS experts.
Yousaf explained the working group had been set up to look at the possibility of council bye-laws being used to implement the zones, an idea which is now firmly off the table.
READ MORE: Seven nations under King Charles would vote to end monarchy, poll says
The FM added: “I’m really happy to speak to Back Off Scotland.
“That working group was in place in relation to when we were looking at local government bye-laws and how they might be able to create safe access zones.
“We’re now looking at a national approach to Gillian Mackay’s bill, so there will still be cross government working, they’ll be cross political working in terms of other political parties and we’ll continue to work closely with local government.
“Back Off Scotland or anyone else who has an interest in this should be in no doubt whatsoever about my commitment to introducing safe access zones around abortion clinics as quickly as we legally possibly can.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel