THE Scottish Conservatives will push for a statement on the turmoil engulfing the SNP, claiming it is "in the public interest".
Led by Douglas Ross, the Tories will use their Holyrood debating time to push for clarity on the financial situation within the government party.
In the past month, both the SNP’s former chief executive (and Nicola Sturgeon’s husband) Peter Murrell and then treasurer Colin Beattie were arrested in connection with a police inquiry into the party’s finances, overshadowing the first month of First Minister Humza Yousaf’s time in office.
Both Murrell and Beattie were questioned and released without charge pending further investigation.
The party has also been without auditors since October, with the Westminster group left with just weeks to file its paperwork with the Electoral Commission or risk losing £1.2 million in funding from Commons authorities to support their work.
The Tories will also hit out at the party for a lack of transparency over its membership figures.
SNP MSP Gordon MacDonald described the motion as a “shocking error in judgment”. He added: “It is the height of hypocrisy for the Scottish Tory leader to be calling into question issues of transparency of political party membership whilst refusing to disclose his own.
“If Douglas Ross wants to salvage the smallest smidge of self-respect then it’s time for him to release his own party membership figures.
“Nobody will be fooled by the Tory Party’s cheap political games though, especially from a party who have some nerve to pontificate about transparency when their Prime Minister was all too eager to ban Scottish journalists from asking questions at their party conference over the weekend.
"And that’s before we even begin to scratch the surface of dodgy PPI deals and their own elusive membership figures.”
The SNP MSP was alluding to a wrangle between Number 10 aides and the Scottish press at the Scottish Tory conference in Glasgow on Friday over access to a press conference with Rishi Sunak.
Speaking ahead of the debate, Ross said: “These questions are not going away for the First Minister and SNP leader, who recently had to step in as the SNP’s acting treasurer.
"He cannot stick his fingers in his ears and claim this is not a matter for his government, as well as his party, especially if the SNP were to face bankruptcy or an imminent threat to their viability.
“This is clearly also a government matter if the First Minister is compromised, his hands are tied, or if he has been kept in the dark about his party’s affairs, as was the case with the auditors.”
The Scottish Tory leader added: “Right now, the real priorities of Scotland are being ignored by him and the SNP government because they are distracted by the meltdown in the party.
"The unacceptable secrecy that has characterised the SNP in government, on ferries, the Lochaber smelter, the Salmond affair and many others, is equally evident in its internal financial scandal, and it has to stop.
“The public must have confidence that Humza Yousaf is treating this investigation as seriously as possible and this debate gives him the opportunity to address these questions in full.”
A previous push for a statement to parliament was rejected by the First Minister, who said: “I don’t think Parliament is the place to do a statement on the party’s finances.”
As well as calling for the statement, Ross’ party will push the government to end the pre-release of statistics, “deliver a more transparent budget process”, publish ministerial expenses and travel quicker and improve scrutiny of breaches of the ministerial code.
The vote, however, is likely to fail thanks to anticipated support for the government from the Greens.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel