PRINCE Andrew’s ex-girlfriend has said she would put “all those protesting” against the monarchy “in jail pre-coronation” – then release them once the celebrations are over.
Lady Victoria Hervey, who is a socialite, aristocrat, and former “it girl” who dated the Duke of York in the 1990s, made the comment while discussing the risk of protesters at the coronation this week on GB News.
In a segment considering “The Clash” between the monarchy and the public, the panel of American “royals expert” Kinsey Schofield, activist and republican Peter Tatchell - who had just confirmed he would be protesting the coronation at Trafalgar Square - and Hervey joined Dan Wootton.
Hervey began by saying that changes to the rule of the pledge should never have been changed, as it has “backfired”.
READ MORE: Princess Anne: Slimming down monarchy is 'not a good idea'
Wootton asked Hervey, “You have no time for anti-monarchists, do you?” which she confirmed and was then asked, “How do you feel about Peter protesting?”
She replied: “You look like a nice enough man, but my feelings when I was asked about this was if it was like illegal immigrants going against the crown, then I would just tell them to leave and go and live in Russia or China or in a communist country where there is no sovereign, where there is no royal family.”
Tatchell responded by saying: “Putin is making quite a good show of it acting like a new Tsar.”
This led Hervey to say: "If I was in charge of this coronation, I'd arrest all the heads of all those people that would be protesting. I would put them all in jail like pre coronation and then release them after."
Aristocrat Lady Victoria Hervey tells GB News:
— Otto English (@Otto_English) May 1, 2023
"If I was in charge of this coronation, I'd arrest all... those... people that would be protesting... I would put them all in jail like pre coronation."
I mean even my jaw is on the floor at this point. pic.twitter.com/DvKEJvuG90
Tatchell looked on amazed, Schofield scoffed – likely in shock that someone had said that sentence, and Wootton asked: “Even if they haven’t done anything criminal?” to which Hervey clarified if they had “any record” of doing any protesting, including climate protesters, they should be arrested.
READ MORE: Jeremy Vine hails video of Inverness locals condemning Prince Andrew
Wootton then questioned the pledge asking for loyalty to be promised to both Prince Andrew and Prince Harry, when the public had “lost faith in them both”.
Hervey made a substantive claim against the women who have given evidence against Prince Andrew, and then fell flat when pressed.
In defence of Prince Andrew specifically, Hervey told Wootton, “I’m going to send you a 200-page document on those girls which tell you everything”
She then defended him as someone who wanted to be involved in the royal family but couldn't because he had been “falsely accused” of crimes.
When she was asked if she would be happy pledging allegiance to Prince Harry, she replied with a long “Um….” and no answer.
I guess loyalty isn't blind and you can pick and choose based on who you like...
Hervey is the eldest child of the 6th Marquess of Bristol and previously caused controversy in 2003 by saying: "It's so bad being homeless in winter. They should go somewhere warm like the Caribbean where they can eat fresh fish all day."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel