THE UK Government has increased the risk that taxpayers will lose money because of the way it has treated banks who lent during its Covid-era loan scheme for small businesses, a group of influential MPs have said.
In a report published on Wednesday the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) accused the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (Beis) of taking a “laissez-faire approach.”
“It is not clear how the department holds to account third parties that deliver multibillion-pound programmes on its behalf,” the MPs said.
“The Committee is concerned that a laissez-faire approach may lead to failure to properly protect taxpayers’ money.”
READ MORE: SNP's John Mason ‘likely’ to stand down at Holyrood election
The MPs added that the department was only making “slow progress” in combating fraud in the Bounce Back Loan scheme, which was launched during the early days of the Covid-19 pandemic.
The loans of up to £50,000 were paid out with minimal checks in order to ensure that they could be paid out rapidly and at scale.
The loans were paid out by normal banks, but with a guarantee that if the borrower could not pay back then the government would compensate the bank.
But the MPs said that the department lacked curiosity about how the banks were performing.
There were “limited requirements” for the data that lenders should collect and share with the government, the MPs said.
PAC chair Dame Meg Hillier said: “At a time of financial crisis the department for business has lost billions of taxpayers’ desperately needed funds.
“It shows no real signs of making the improvements that would prevent the big mistakes it has made over many years, especially during the pandemic, happening all over again.”
In the wide-ranging report into the department, the MPs also said that it was being too slow compensating people who were impacted by the Post Office Horizon scandal.
Beis expects to pay out around £579 million to the Post Office so it can compensate the victims and still stay afloat.
But according to reports, victims are only getting partial payments, and the committee said that Beis should set a date for when it expects all claims to be settled.
Hillier said: “It’s moving too slowly to compensate people for the lives ruined through the Post Office Horizon scandal.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel