IN 2022, Prince Andrew, the late Queen Elizabeth’s second son, paid a reported £12 million to avoid going to court over allegations he sexually assaulted a minor.
Amid the row around the royal’s links to billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, Andrew was stripped of titles and positions including being called “His Royal Highness” and an air commodore of RAF Lossiemouth. He has already lost his role as a patron of the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra.
Yet, he remains the Earl of Inverness.
READ MORE: ‘Utter disgrace that Andrew claims lordship over Inverness’, SNP MP says
The National is launching a petition, to coincide with the run-up to King Charles’s coronation, calling on the monarch to finally act and remove the title which locals say has brought their hometown into "disrepute".
To get the ball rolling, we went to Inverness to ask people there what they thought of the disgraced royal holding a title over them – and the responses were pretty uniform.
Unionists and independentistas alike were keen to add their name to the petition.
One memorable moment came after a lady passing on the street heard The National was looking to gather names.
“I’m a Unionist and I’ll happily sign that,” she said. It turned out the other person signing at the same moment was an Alba supporter – but the two found common ground.
We even spoke to one serviceman, based at RAF Lossiemouth, who said he would like to see Andrew be stripped of the title over his city like he had lost the title over his base.
The staff at Lossiemouth were more than happy to see the “Earl of Inverness” stripped of his air commodore title, he told us.
Andrew has maintained that he is innocent of any wrongdoing.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel