BORIS Johnson’s former chief adviser, Dominic Cummings, has revealed polling data that suggests Donald Trump will win the 2024 US presidential election.
Cummings will not say why or who he is working with and gives little detail on the methodology of his model– leaving many people to question the accuracy of the data.
His model predicts that Trump will win 294 electoral college votes if he were to stand against Biden – a majority of 270 electoral college votes are needed to win the presidency.
Robert Peston – Political editor of ITV – shared a link to Cumming's blog on Twitter stating: "Dominic Cummings has done polling and data processing on the US 2024 presidential election.
"In classic Cummings style he won’t say why or who he is working with, and gives little detail on methodology. Attached are his electoral college estimates."
However, the post drew online criticism from many users due to the unverified nature of the polling statistics used by Cummings, which Peston shared.
.@Dominic2306 has done polling and data processing on the US 2024 presidential election. In classic Cummings style he won’t say why or who he is working with, and gives little detail on methodology. Attached are his electoral college estimates. They show Trump beats Biden just… pic.twitter.com/lQBszMlBIg
— Robert Peston (@Peston) April 17, 2023
The electoral college is the voting system used in America for presidential elections – each state is assigned a certain number of these electoral votes based on the number of congressional districts that they have, which roughly reflects the population of each state.
However, even the smallest states such as North Dakota require a minimum of three electoral votes which means larger states like Florida and California are underrepresented.
According to Cummings's numbers, Ron DeSantis – the governor of Florida, who is expected to run against Trump for the Republican nomination – would defeat Biden by a superior margin to Trump.
Trump also beats Kamala Harris much more convincingly than he would Biden, meanwhile the former president only marginally beats left-wing Democratic Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
In his blog, Cummings stated: “We built a model (with many times more data than normal polls) to predict who would win the electoral college in different matchups.
"We explored attitudes to possible presidential candidates. We explored crucial issues like the cost of living, health, abortion, crime and Ukraine.”
Cummings claimed that as part of the survey they ran focus groups in key states such as Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin.
He also wrote: "We made more effort than is made in normal polls to ensure we had an accurate sample of low-education, low-trust voters who do not pay much attention to normal news."
It’s important to note all the data was collected before Donald Trump was arrested in a case examining hush money paid to women who alleged sexual encounters with him.
However, Cummings – who was previously described as Boris Johnson’s de facto chief of staff – states that they actually found support among Republican voters for Trump increased after he was arrested.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel