THE BBC is facing questions after one of its senior journalists liked a series of political posts on social media, including one from someone saying they “can’t stand” SNP leader Humza Yousaf.
David Waddell, a senior producer and reporter for BBC World Business who according to his LinkedIn profile has been with the broadcaster for more than two decades, may have broken the corporation’s social media guidelines with his Twitter usage.
Waddell has also engaged with the anonymous Unionist troll account “Effie Deans” on more than one occasion.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf issues clear response as BBC asks: 'Will you resign?'
In one post he appeared to defend Deans from accusations of Islamophobia after suggestions that Yousaf should be asked if he "regrets the existence of the state of Israel", "regrets that Islam did not spread to Europe", and if he would "prefer it if Islam were the only religion".
Elsewhere, Waddell posted that the SNP would issue a "predictable wail" after Chancellor Jeremy Hunt said "independence is always better than dependence", and liked a post which appeared to complain that a photo of Yousaf praying in Bute House “only gets praise”.
"Independence is always better than dependence," says @Jeremy_Hunt. Given the predictable wail of appreciation from the SNP, did he think that one through?
— David Waddell 🌍⛵🚴♂️🏃♂️🥃🇬🇧☘️ (@David_Waddell) March 15, 2023
The issue of religion in the SNP leadership race is something Waddell appears to have engaged with, liking tweets about both Kate Forbes and Yousaf’s positions on issues such as gay marriage, and the media scrutiny which surrounded them.
One post about Yousaf, which Waddell liked, read: “Can’t stand the bloke but I think it’s fair to say ‘I have a belief, which is an act of faith that is personal to me, but not something I would seek to impose on those who don’t believe’.”
The BBC journalist has liked tweets from pro-UK figures such as Ulster Unionist Party leader Doug Beattie and former Reclaim leader and Brexit Party MEP Martin Daubney, as well as one calling “many” on the left of politics "raging snobs", and another calling a Labour MP "dreadful at the best of times".
Elsewhere, Waddell has liked a tweet calling Prince Harry a "weapons grade wacko" who is “off his rocker”.
Further tweets from Waddell, and ones he has liked and shared, make clear on which side of the gender reform debate he falls.
He has liked posts suggesting that trans children are victims of abuse and that gender-affirming care is “killing” people, that healthcare for trans people is “NOT life saving”, and one where a person says an "MRA [men's rights activist] Twitter pile on" had motivated them.
The BBC’s rules on social media activity, which apply particularly to “individuals involved in the production or presentation of any output in news or other factual areas”, make clear that Waddell should not have a public opinion “for or against any policy which is a matter of current party political debate”, such as gender reform.
Waddell became engaged in public arguments with trans rights campaigners after he criticised Calderdale Council, in West Yorkshire, for posting a health message encouraging "anyone with a cervix" to get screened for cervical cancer.
This looks like one of those occasions where you could use the word 'woman' and most people would accurately infer it was being used as a sex label and not as a gender label. Instead you've gone for tortuous language which will be confusing to some and offensive to many.
— David Waddell 🌍⛵🚴♂️🏃♂️🥃🇬🇧☘️ (@David_Waddell) April 11, 2023
He wrote in response that the council had opted to use “tortuous language which will be confusing to some and offensive to many”. He further claimed it was “highly provocative”.
Waddell added after the council deleted the post: “Well I see @Calderdale has withdrawn the tweet, which tells its own story … I just think mentioning 'people with cervixes' in a healthcare promo when *on the whole* you mean women, is a bit of a comms self-own.”
Other senior BBC figures have been reprimanded for their use of social media, which the corporation deemed partisan.
Emily Maitlis, the former Newsnight host, was rapped on the knuckles after she shared a Piers Morgan tweet which read: “If failing to quarantine properly is punishable by 10yrs in prison, what is the punishment for failing to properly protect the country from a pandemic?”
READ MORE: What to expect from the BBC’s social media review after Gary Lineker row
And Gary Lineker, the football pundit, caused a storm after he accused the UK Government of echoing the rhetoric of 1930s Germany in their treatment of asylum seekers.
The BBC guidance suggests that Waddell may have breached it through his engagement on social media.
It says: “Expressions of opinion on social media can take many forms – from straightforward tweets or updates, sharing or liking content, following particular accounts or using campaigning or political hashtags.
“If for example a member of staff repeatedly likes or shares, without comment, content reflecting a particular point of view on a matter of public controversy it might create the impression that individual agrees with that view.
“Likewise if a member of staff only follows social media accounts reflecting one point of view on a matter of public controversy that might create a similar impression.”
SNP president Michael Russell (above) said the “position of BBC correspondents has to be absolutely impartial”.
Russell went on: “The complaints in the Yes movement about a lack of impartiality are given extra substance when it becomes clear that the BBC does not enforce it for its own employees. This requires to be sorted out, and not just for the one individual.
“It should be a reminder to the entire organisation that their attitude is far from neutral as far as both the SNP and independence is concerned.”
The BBC has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel