KING Charles and Queen Elizabeth took more than £1 billion in income from two controversial property empires, it has been revealed.
A Guardian investigation unearthed the scale of the income the monarch and his late mother received from the duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall, which run huge portfolios of real estate in England.
The two professionally-run estates have been at the centre of a centuries-long debate over whether their profits should go to the public instead.
Duchy accounts, held in parliamentary and state archives, have revealed how the late Queen and Charles – in his role as the Duke of Cornwall - benefitted from a huge increase in their revenues from the duchies during Elizabeth's reign.
Last year, their duchy income totalled £41.8m. Factoring in inflation, it means the pair have received the equivalent of more than £1.2bn in total revenues from the two estates.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon pulls out of climate change event
The duchies operate as professionally-run real estate empires that manage farmland, medieval castles, hotels, offices, shops and some of London’s prime luxury real estate.
Profits from the Duchy of Lancaster – valued at £652m - pass automatically to whoever is on the throne.
The Duchy of Cornwall is worth more than £1bn and its profits automatically go to the male heir to the throne. The profits from the estate now go to Prince William, making him a billionaire and one of the largest landowners in England.
The royal family’s claim to the profits goes back to when England was divided into medieval fiefdoms.
Generations of MPs have since called for the duchy profits to go to the Treasury instead, with each debate usually coinciding with a new monarch.
The royals insist their duchy income is “private” and the government treats it as entirely separate from the sovereign grant - the annual payment the royal family receives from the government to cover its official costs which costs the taxpayer £86m a year.
Buckingham Palace did not comment on The Guardian’s figures.
READ MORE: New tax law as higher earners in Scotland set to pay more
The family have never revealed exactly how the cash is spent, despite having suggested it is used for official duties, public work or charitable causes.
Charles has reported 49% to 51% of his duchy income was spent covering public and charitable functions in recent years.
As Prince of Wales, a large part of Charles’s duchy income was spent privately, including on secretaries, valets, gardeners, chefs, stable hands and farm workers.
Queen Elizabeth was reported to have used Duchy of Lancaster income to help Prince Andrew pay an undisclosed sum of what is thought to have been more than £9m to end the sexual assault case filed against him by Virginia Giuffre.
What are the duchies?
The Duchy of Lancaster dates back to 1265 when Henry III seized land after a failed revolt by feudal lords who wanted to limit the powers of the king and gain some representation. The king gave the land, mostly in the north, to his son Edmund.
In the 14th and 15th centuries, two other kings – Henry IV and Henry VII – issued charters reasserting their claim that the Duchy of Lancaster would always remain in the private hands of whoever was on the throne.
The Duchy of Cornwall was created in 1337 by King Edward III to provide an income for his son from land in southern England. He stipulated via royal charter that the estate would always be owned by the male heir to the throne.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel