MONTENEGRO'S long-standing leader Milo Djukanovic has suffered a crushing presidential election defeat.
Economy expert and political novice Jakov Milatovic declared victory on Sunday evening after the presidential run-off, defeating Djukanovic, who led Montenegro to independence from much larger Serbia in 2006 and to Nato membership in 2017, despite strong opposition from former Slavic ally Russia.
The result heralds Djukanovic's final departure from the small Balkan state’s political scene after more than 30 years in power.
Milatovic won around 60% of the vote, according to reliable independent pollsters, and Djukanovic has conceded defeat. The first official results are expected later on Monday.
The newcomer’s victory is believed to reflect voter fatigue with Djukanovic – who has served as president twice and prime minister seven times – as well as disillusionment with established politicians.
Although the presidency is largely a ceremonial position in Montenegro, it influences the political trends in the country.
READ MORE: Australia will 'inevitably' become a republic, says high commissioner
“Djukanovic is one of the longest-ruling leaders in Europe and in the world,” said political analyst Ana Nenezic.
“He has ruled for more than Belarus leader (Aleksander) Lukashenko, which is strange in any democratic society … 32 years is too much for a country.”
Montenegrin political analyst Fedja Pavlovic said Djukanovic was “sent to political retirement, this time irrevocably”.
This was Djukanovic’s first loss in an election since he first entered politics in the former Yugoslav republic in the early 1990s.
During his decades in power, the 61-year-old switched from a pro-Serbian communist to a pro-Western politician.
Milatovic, 36, first entered politics in 2020 after finishing his education in Britain and the United States.
He promised to lead the small Balkan nation into the European Union within the next five years.
The outcome of Sunday’s election is likely to reflect on an early parliamentary vote set for June 11.
READ MORE: Finland to become Nato member, secretary-general confirms
That vote was scheduled because of a months-long government deadlock that stalled Montenegro’s pending European Union membership and alarmed the West as war rages in Ukraine.
Though Milatovic’s Europe Now group is not formally part of the country’s ruling coalition, his presidential candidacy won backing from the shaky alliance that includes parties advocating closer ties with neighbouring Serbia and Russia.
Milatovic has denied Djukanovic’s allegations that the governing coalition was pushing Montenegro back under Serbian and Russian influence.
The country of some 620,000 people is deeply split between those who consider Montenegro a sovereign nation and about 30% of the population who consider themselves Serbs.
Relations between Serbia and Montenegro have deteriorated since Djukanovic took the country out of the union with Serbia and later into Nato.
During the election campaign, Djukanovic said voters were choosing between membership in the EU, or joining the “Serbian World” – a copy of the “Russian World”.
Serbia’s President Aleksandar Vucic congratulated Milatovic on his victory, saying: “In Serbia, you will always have a reliable partner.”
During his tenure, Djukanovic and his party officials have often been accused of corruption and of pressuring the judiciary. He has often denied accumulating a large fortune for himself and his family.
“End of an era: Milatovic is the president,” read newspaper headlines a day after the vote.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel