THE UK’s broadcasting watchdog has decided former Tory culture secretary Nadine Dorries’s interview with her old boss Boris Johnson did not break any rules around due impartiality.
Ofcom said it had investigated the programme after receiving some 40 complaints about the “Friday Night with Nadine” programme broadcast on Talk TV on February 3, 2023.
These complaints alleged the programme had breached the due impartiality requirements by having the former Tory prime minister interviewed by one of his closest allies.
However, Ofcom said on Monday it had “decided that it did not raise issues warranting investigation”.
READ MORE: Ofcom chief expertly grilled on why Tory MPs can host news programmes
It went on: “Taking into consideration that the assessment involved matters of public interest relating to the issue of politicians acting as presenters on television and radio, Ofcom has exceptionally decided to publish the reasons for its decision.”
In its reasoning, the watchdog said having Dorries as a host did not breach rules because her show is a “weekly discussion programme” and not strictly news.
It concluded due impartiality rules did apply however, but that the comment from in-studio pundits provided the balance required and the broadcast had not breached rules.
“We considered that alternative viewpoints, content and challenge were sufficiently reflected in this non-news programme, and we will not be pursuing further,” Ofcom said.
However, Ofcom said it has launched a fuller investigation into a broadcast of “Saturday Morning with Esther and Philip”, which aired on GB News on March 11 and featured Tory MPs Esther McVey and Philip Davies, who are also married, interviewing Tory Chancellor Jeremy Hunt.
The watchdog has previously confirmed it was assessing complaints about the broadcast, but a larger probe has now been launched.
“We’re investigating whether this broke our rules requiring news and current affairs to be presented with due impartiality,” Ofcom said.
“As part of this, we will look at the programme’s compliance with our rules on politicians presenting programmes, and whether it included a wide range of significant views relating to a matter of major political controversy or current public policy.”
The interview in question saw Hunt make unchallenged claims such as that nuclear is necessary because it is not possible to provide for 100% of the UK’s energy requirements through renewables.
It also saw McVey say she wanted to talk about “how I could help you reduce taxes”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel