THE UK Government must shelve its "ill thought out" plans to expand nuclear power and allow further oil and gas exploration, the Scottish Greens have said.
The Tories released thousands of pages of documents on Thursday as part of what was billed as Green Day – big new proposals to help the UK reach its environmental targets.
Experts largely argued that there was little of actual substance in the announcements, with most of the money already having been earmarked in the past.
READ MORE: Scotland generated record level of renewable electricity in 2022
The Scottish Greens were no exception, saying it was “ill thought out” and “does not live up to the scale of the crisis that we face”.
They took particular aim at Tory plans to expand the UK’s nuclear power capacity.
Last November, the Government announced the establishment of Great British Nuclear – a body which is meant to support the industry.
On Thursday, it announced the names of the two experts who will lead the agency and said it would be based in the Greater Manchester area. It did not appear to reveal any new funding for the body, however.
The Greens decried nuclear power as “costly” and said it will leave a “toxic legacy”. They also asked for assurances that taxpayers in Scotland won’t pay for nuclear reactors across the UK given the Scottish Government is opposed to nuclear power.
Mark Ruskell, Scottish Greens energy and environment spokesperson, said: “These plans are ill thought out and do not live up to the scale of the crisis that we face. A lot of these announcements are rehashed and will not address the biggest problem of all, which is our dependence on oil and gas.
“Grant Shapps may talk a good game about wind power, but his government is also planning 100 climate-wrecking oil licences for the north sea. The two are completely incompatible.
“There are renewables projects that could be delivering the climate action we need here and now, but they are stuck waiting years for a connection to the electricity grid. Unless the UK Government acts to speed up grid connections it will hold back Scotland’s renewable ambitions.
“Instead we are seeing a big emphasis on nuclear energy, which is no solution. It is extremely costly, dangerous and takes years, if not decades, to become operational. It will also leave a toxic legacy for future generations.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf: Margaret Ferrier should stand down for 'reckless action'
“It will only drive up bills further. The Scottish Government has rightly opposed nuclear power in Scotland, and we must ensure that people in Scotland are not paying for a project that we have opposed time and again.
“The climate emergency is happening all around us, we don't have time to waste by pouring billions of pounds of public money into fossil fuels and unproven and money-haemorrhaging technologies."
Ruskell said investment should be in renewables that "we already have and that we know works".
He added: “Here in Scotland, we are taking ambitious steps to boost investment in renewables and drive a just transition away from fossil fuels. We have an abundance of clean and natural resources that will allow us to build a greener future.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel