ASYLUM seekers are set to be housed in disused military bases, ferries and barges under UK Government plans to reduce spending on hotels.
Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick will announce the use of two RAF sites on Wednesday as he tries to reduce the £6.8 million a day the Government says it spends on hotel accommodation.
The plans have already divided opinion amongst the Conservative Party with Foreign Secretary James Cleverly having already criticised suggestions that a base in his Essex constituency would be used.
“I highlighted the remote nature of the site, the limited transport infrastructure and narrow road network and that these factors would mean the site wasn’t appropriate for asylum accommodation,” he wrote on Facebook.
However, Deputy PM Dominic Raab later told Sky News he knows that Cleverly "fully supports this policy".
READ MORE: What it was like in Holyrood as Humza Yousaf won vote to become FM
Sources also downplayed the likelihood of barges and ferries being used imminently, saying none had actually been purchased yet.
Jenrick will announce that people in the UK after making Channel crossings on small boats will be housed at RAF Wethersfield and RAF Scampton.
A Government source said there is a “direction of travel” towards using ferries and barges as well but confirmed “nothing has been bought”.
“There are no barges or ferries”, the source said, following reports in multiple newspapers.
Rishi Sunak told his Cabinet on Tuesday that the cost of using hotels and the pressure it puts on local areas meant it was not sustainable.
The Prime Minister later told MPs that children cannot be exempted from plans to detain people who cross the Channel in small boats to prevent the creation of a “pull factor”.
Appearing before the Commons Liaison Committee, he also downplayed suggestions that flights under the UK Government’s stalled Rwanda policy could begin this summer.
Home Secretary Suella Braverman recently visited the country in a PR stint dubbed as something from “a disturbing holiday album” by the Greens.
A UK Government spokesperson said: “We have always been upfront about the unprecedented pressure being placed on our asylum system, brought about by a significant increase in dangerous and illegal journeys into the country.
“We continue to work across Government and with local authorities to identify a range of accommodation options.
“The Government remains committed to engaging with local authorities and key stakeholders as part of this process.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel