KEIR Starmer’s move to block Jeremy Corbyn from running to be a Labour MP at the next election has been approved.
A Labour spokesman said the leader’s motion passed by 22 votes to 12 by the party’s National Executive Committee (NEC) on Tuesday afternoon.
This now means it is down to Corbyn to decide whether to run as an independent candidate.
The veteran left-winger has represented Islington North since 1983, and previously criticised the move as “undermining the party’s internal democracy” before its approval.
READ MORE: UK Government plans could lead to 'homeless' Afghan refugees
If Corbyn runs as an independent in the north London constituency where he retains significant support it could cause a distracting challenge for Starmer at the next election.
The motion cited the defeat Corbyn led Labour to as leader in the 2019 general election in arguing his candidacy should be blocked.
Labour’s chances of winning the next election and securing a majority in the Commons would be “significantly diminished” if Corbyn was endorsed, it argued.
The move will not be welcomed in all wings of the parliamentary Labour Party, where Corbyn retains the support of those aligned with the Socialist Campaign Group.
READ MORE: UK front pages show varying interest in winner of SNP leadership race
MP Nadia Whittome, who has served on Starmer’s frontbench, described the motion as “divisive, an attack on party democracy and a distraction”.
Activist Jon Lansman, the co-founder of the Corbyn-backing Momentum pressure group, suggested the Labour leader is acting like an “authoritarian”.
“Keir Starmer unfortunately is behaving as if he was some kind of Putin of the Labour Party. That is not the way we do politics,” he told Times Radio.
However, Lansman said it would be a “big mistake” for Corbyn to run as an independent, saying he wants to see Starmer form a Labour government.
Corbyn’s allies were highlighting Starmer’s comments expressing support for the local membership selecting their candidates “for every election” while he was running to become Labour leader.
“The selections for Labour candidates needs to be more democratic and we should end NEC impositions of candidates,” he said in 2020.
The Islington North Labour Party said on Tuesday they “strongly support” Starmer’s former position and rejected the NEC’s “undue interference” in the constituency.
They argued it “undermines our goal of defeating the Conservatives and working with our communities for social justice”.
NEC member Shabana Mahmood, Labour’s national campaign co-ordinator, insisted constituency members “do get a chance to vote” but “it is always left to the NEC to endorse those candidates”.
“This is a clear demonstration of Keir making changes to our party to make sure that we can win the trust of the British people again,” she told reporters.
“We are in this position because Jeremy has failed to take the responsibility. I think it was incumbent of him to respond to the findings of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission in a way that would acknowledge the seriousness of what they said had happened to our party under his leadership, he has failed to do that.”
READ MORE: Shona Robison named Scotland's deputy first minister by Humza Yousaf
Corbyn remains a member of the Labour Party but has lost the whip, meaning he is sitting in the Commons as an independent.
However, party rules mean he could lose the membership he has held for nearly 60 years if he does announce he will run against an official Labour candidate.
He was suspended over his response to the Equality and Human Rights Commission finding Labour under his leadership was responsible for unlawful acts of harassment and discrimination as he struggled to tackle antisemitism.
The equalities watchdog lifted Labour out of two years of special measures last month, in what Starmer called an “important moment in the history of the Labour Party”.
Starmer then promptly announced he would bar his predecessor before bringing the formal motion sealing his fate on Tuesday.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel