THE Scottish Tories have responded with outrage after Humza Yousaf branded the Westminster government “foreign” during a debate.
The Health Secretary coined the phrase during a tense clash over gender reforms during the final SNP leadership debate on Times Radio.
Yousaf said he would send Holyrood lawyers to court if he becomes first minister to try and overturn a Section 35 block on the Gender Recognition Reform (GRR) Bill.
Kate Forbes said she would only go to court if there was no alternative adding: “If we are a party that wants to be independent, we need to be able to resolve our challenges ourselves.”
Yousaf then said: “If we were independent, we would not have a foreign government, for example, coming in and vetoing our legislation."
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf to try attend both coronation and Yes rally on May 6
Since Yousaf made the comment, the Tories have also written to Yousaf urging him to drop the “inflammatory and polarising language” and govern for the whole of Scotland if he becomes first minister.
Tory MSP Sharon Dowey said: “Humza Yousaf needs to drop this inflammatory and polarising language now.
“To refer to the UK Government as ‘a foreign government’ is plain wrong: Scotland has two governments, and he knows this.
“By choosing to use this divisive rhetoric he is sending a dog whistle to extreme Nationalists and showing contempt to the majority of the population who support Scotland’s place in the Union.
“Scotland doesn’t need or want a ‘First Activist’, it requires a First Minister who will heal the divisions that have blighted Scotland ever since 2014.”
Scottish Tories have also slammed him on social media, with MP Andrew Bowie branding him “idiotic”.
Bowie tweeted: “I'm a Scot. I represent a Scottish constituency. I am also a minister in the UK Government.
“I'd like to ask Humza how that's possible if it is a "foreign" government?
I'm a Scot. I represent a Scottish constituency. I am also a Minister in the UK Government. I'd like to ask Humza how that's possible if it is a "foreign" government?
— Andrew Bowie MP (@AndrewBowie_MP) March 22, 2023
Crass. Offensive. Idiotic. Playing to the base. This is the *best* the SNP have to offer. :face_palm::male_sign: https://t.co/UrduGQuK6C
“Crass. Offensive. Idiotic. Playing to the base. This is the *best* the SNP have to offer.”
Tory MSP Stephen Kerr meanwhile said the comment from Yousaf made it look like he was scared of losing the race.
He said: “This smells of Humza thinking he's losing the leadership race, and playing to the lowest denominator to attract a few more SNP members' votes.”
Another Tory MSP, Tess White, added: “Humza Yousaf's 'foreign government' comment says it all. Just another SNP politician pandering to the Nationalist base and ignoring the priorities of the Scottish people.”
Roz McCall said there was nothing foreign about "our friends” in the rest of the UK.
She tweeted: “Having lived outside of Scotland for a short period of my life, I can tell Humza there is nothing foreign about our friends and neighbours in the rest of the United Kingdom.”
During the debate, Yousaf did add that he would drop his legal challenge to the blocking of the GRR Bill if he is advised that the Scottish Government would lose.
Forbes previously said she would have voted against the bill if she had not been on maternity leave, but went on to say she agrees with reforming the Gender Recognition Act.
Ash Regan, one of the gender bill’s fiercest critics in government, said that any court challenge would fail.
During the debate, she said: “I don’t think that shows us standing up to the UK Government. I think that is something that you want to do for things where you have the public behind you.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel