BLINK and you might have missed the latest development in the rollercoaster that is the SNP’s leadership contest.
On Friday evening, the SNP’s communications chief at Holyrood, former Daily Record editor Murray Foote, resigned.
On Saturday morning, SNP chief executive Peter Murrell resigned.
On Saturday afternoon, SNP president Michael Russell was installed as interim chief executive in Murrell’s place. And less than an hour later, one Scottish Tory MSP was telling him to resign as well.
Sandesh Gulhane, the Tory health spokesperson at Holyrood, decided that 45 minutes as SNP chief executive was too long for Russell, saying on Twitter that he “needs to step down” …
Responding to the news of the SNP president’s temporary new role, Gulhane wrote: “The man who thinks people who don’t hold the exact same view as him are enemies?!?!?
“Needs to step down.”
The man who thinks people who don’t hold the exact same view as him are enemies?!?!?
— Dr Sandesh Gulhane MSP (@Sandeshgulhane) March 18, 2023
Needs to step down
The reference was to a tweet from Russell in which he tried to calm an SNP leadership race descending into a row over voting transparency.
He wrote: "As @theSNP president I have told the national secretary I support publishing membership figures. I also have full confidence in her & the external verification & count.
“I am disgusted by the abuse directed at @theSNP staff by individuals who damage our cause & aid our enemies.”
Russell has been dismissive of the manufactured outrage from Tories over his use of the word “enemies”, responding to one MSP who kicked up a fuss: “If the cap fits…”
As such, it seems vanishingly unlikely that Gulhane’s calls for an immediate resignation will do anything more than fall on deaf ears.
Perhaps he should have waited longer than 45 minutes.
And they say a week is a long time in politics.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel