A RECRUITMENT drive was a top priority for Edinburgh University Young Greens at the start of the academic year.
A small society “badly hit by the pandemic”, it had also seen a number of its members graduate and at the start of September consisted of just four people. The push to persuade more students to join up paid off, with the total jumping to 30 by the end of the month.
Ruth Elliott, a third-year politics student, successfully ran for president at the AGM in November and with a restored membership, she hopes to get the society on the campaign trail with the main party.
That includes supporting the Gender Recognition Reform Bill, which the UK Government is currently blocking, as well as MSP Gillian Mackay’s abortion buffer zones bill.
The society is campaigning to end single-use plastic in all University of Edinburgh cafes as, in Elliott’s words: “Someone has to set the ball rolling.”
However, as with other student societies, Elliott’s challenge has been getting members to turn up. “It’s frustrating,” she said. “How can we motivate people to come?”
External speakers have proved popular. At the start of the academic year, the society had Green councillors Ben Parker and Jule Bandel as guests. The latter is still a student at Edinburgh and was formerly society’s secretary.
Elliott grew up in Cumbria and was a member of the English Greens before switching when she moved to Edinburgh for her studies.
Thanks to her involvement, she plans to stay in Scotland after graduating. “Through getting more involved in the Greens, I have become more embedded in Edinburgh as a community,” she said. “The Edinburgh branch is a space I’m really comfortable in.”
As an environmentalist first, Elliott said that in her view: “Independence needs to be seen as a means to an end and not the end goal itself — a sustainable, liveable planet.”
She commended Scotland’s renewable energy production over rUK, saying: “Scotland is leading the way.”
“Climate change is the most urgent issue of our time,” Elliott added. “We need collective action – including the billionaires, the politicians, the corporations.”
In her case, that collective action starts at a university level. “Even though it’s a small difference, the small differences add up. We really matter, and our voices are strong.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel