SUE Gray opposed ministers blocking Scotland’s Gender Recognition Reform Bill, according to reports.
Tories have expressed concern over Gray’s role in the partygate investigation since it emerged that she would be appointed Keir Starmer’s chief of staff – marking a move from a civil service role to one directly in politics.
Johnson said it is “concerning” that the inquiry into whether he lied to MPs over Covid rule-breaking Number 10 will rely on evidence by investigator Gray, given she will now be working for Labour.
The former prime minister and his allies have used Gray’s job change to try to discredit the cross-party Privileges Committee inquiry into whether he lied to the House of Commons over lockdown breaches.
Now an email has been leaked showing Gray’s opposition to the Tories using a Section 35 order to block the Scottish legislation – reportedly sent while she was negotiating to take the job with Labour.
On December 22, it was agreed that Rishi Sunak and the Scottish Secretary to use the Section 35 order to veto the law, which had been passed by politicians from all parties in Holyrood.
READ MORE: Five reasons why the UK Government blocked Scotland's gender bill
Gray sent an email to those discussing the decision to say: “I found reference to S35 difficult, but I found even more difficult the words about stopping the Bill. But as you say, this seems to have been agreed.”
One minister told the Daily Mail they found the email “strange”, arguing they were acting to stop legislation which would be “dangerous for women and children”. The bill in question sets out to make it easier for people to legally change their gender, and lowers the minimum age to do so from 18 to 16.
The minister told the newspaper “One of the most senior civil servants in the country was attempting to block us. We couldn’t understand why.”
The concern from Gray has been used to suggest long-standing links between Gray and Labour, despite Keir Starmer indicating he wouldn’t oppose the UK’s block of the gender law.
Although Scottish Labour backed the bill, Starmer has failed to come out strongly on it.
Gray did not comment on the story, but a friend told the Mail: “Sue worked conscientiously and with great integrity for over 30 years as a civil servant. She gave fearless advice and was respected by colleagues and senior politicians.”
This week, the Privileges Committee also defended its probe, saying it is “not based on the Sue Gray report”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel