THE Prime Minister has come under fire after a meeting on Northern Ireland between the King and the leader of the EU was cancelled.
European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen had been expected to travel to Britain on Saturday amid speculation a deal to fix issues with the Northern Ireland Protocol is near.
The German politician was also due to meet the King at Windsor Castle, Sky News said.
There were talks about calling a potential protocol pact the “Windsor Agreement” after a meeting with Charles, the broadcaster said.
UK Government sources confirmed von der Leyen’s trip was called off but it is likely Downing Street and Buckingham Palace worked together on the reported arrangements.
READ MORE: Our SNP leader poll exploded with 600k votes – here's what we know
Rishi Sunak’s critics said the scheduled meeting brought into question his handling of the protocol negotiations.
Jacob Rees-Mogg, a former business secretary and senior member of the Tory Eurosceptic European Research Group (ERG), told the PA news agency: “If there were a plan to bring the King in before there is domestic political agreement, it would border on constitutional impropriety.”
Sunak is keen to secure the backing of not only his Tory MPs but also the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) for any protocol reform as he looks to restore powersharing in Belfast.
The DUP is refusing to take part in Stormont’s devolved government in protest at the impact the Brexit treaty is having on trade between Northern Ireland and Great Britain.
Former DUP deputy leader Lord Dodds said meeting von der Leyen would have politicised the monarch, and argued the reports “reinforce the questions about No 10’s political judgment over the protocol”.
Sammy Wilson, a DUP MP, said any Windsor rendezvous with the EU leader would have been “a cynical use” of the King’s position and seen in Unionist circles as the sovereign endorsing the deal.
He branded the Prime Minister “naive” and accused him of “dragging the King into a hugely controversial political issue”.
“The only conclusion we can come to is he knows that in these negotiations he hasn’t achieved the objectives he set out for himself and his own party," Wilson said of the PM.
“Nor has he achieved the promises that he had made to ourselves and was now trying to get the King to pull the thing over the line for him.”
READ MORE: Kate Forbes stands by blog post that says women should not become church ministers
Baroness Kate Hoey, a Northern Irish Brexit supporter and former Labour MP, said any such meeting would have been “outrageous”.
UK Government sources said that, while von der Leyen’s trip was no longer going ahead, it would not have been improper for the King, as head of state, to meet a visiting European leader.
“It would be wrong to suggest the King would be involved in anything remotely political,” a Government source told PA.
Buckingham Palace would not comment.
Labour’s shadow Northern Ireland secretary Peter Kyle said Downing Street should have realised utilising the King would have “constitutional implications” and been “highly insensitive to the politics of Northern Ireland”.
“It certainly is nothing we should be involving His Majesty in,” he told Sky.
No 10 said Sunak will be spending the weekend speaking to “relevant stakeholders” as he looks to get a protocol deal over the line.
Downing Street said “intensive negotiations” with Brussels are still taking place.
Foreign Secretary James Cleverly, who has had regular meetings with commission vice-president Maroš Šefčovič, said talks with the EU have been “tough and complicated” but were “entered into in good spirits, with good faith”.
He told GB News on Saturday: “I really hope that we can get this resolved, but we will resolve this when we have addressed all the issues that we are seeking to resolve rather than [working to] some arbitrary deadline.”
Multiple reports suggest the deal between the UK and the EU is all but done – with Sunak delaying an announcement until he is confident it will be accepted.
The protocol, signed by former prime minister Boris Johnson in 2020, was designed to prevent a hard border with Ireland after Brexit by effectively keeping Northern Ireland in the EU’s single market.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf unveils plans for regional assemblies and SNP presence in Brussels
But the treaty has incensed unionists due to the trade barriers it created between Northern Ireland and the rest of the United Kingdom.
According to The Times, the current offer on the table would mean an overhauled protocol, which would remove almost all checks and most paperwork on goods crossing the Irish Sea.
The newspaper said the agreement would also mean control over the rate of VAT and state aid policy will fall to Westminster rather than Brussels for the first time since Brexit was enacted.
Speculation that No 10 is preparing to confirm a deal to fix the protocol intensified on Friday after a Downing Street source said “good progress” was made during a phone call between the Prime Minister and the commission president.
Any announcement of a deal is expected to set up a possible clash with Brexit hardliners, with the Prime Minister promising MPs will be given the chance to “express” their views on the new terms.
The DUP has issued seven tests to win its backing for any deal, including addressing what it calls the “democratic deficit” of Northern Ireland being subject to EU rules while not having a say on them.
The Daily Telegraph, which said a breakthrough could come over the weekend, said it was understood the DUP is set to be granted a place at the negotiating table when the EU is considering new laws applicable in Northern Ireland.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel