DEVELOPERS have submitted revised plans for a major tourism resort on the shores on Loch Lomond after concerns were expressed about their previous proposal.
In 2019, the company behind the proposed Lomond Banks development in Balloch – theme park company Flamingo Land – withdrew its initial proposal after more than 60,000 people signed a petition calling for it to be scrapped.
Officials at the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Authority also recommended that the plans be abandoned.
However, a revised planning proposal was submitted in 2022 which would see the construction of two hotels, up to 127 self-catering cottages, a waterpark and a monorail on the site.
The National Park Authority then requested answers on 16 separate issues it had with the proposal from Lomond Banks contractors Stantec.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Douglas Ross 'sounding scared' of Humza Yousaf
Concerns included the lack of a detailed Environmental Impact Assessment on the area, including the project’s potential impact on ancient woodlands and water quality.
Now, Lomond Banks has resubmitted the proposal after making what it says are significant amendments to the plan.
A woodland area that was previously set for destruction, known as Area 10, would now be retained and more native tree planting scheduled if given the go-ahead.
Jim Paterson, development director for Lomond Banks, said: “We have been committed to listening to the National Park, the local community, local businesses and all other key stakeholders, and their feedback to date has really helped to shape our plans into something that fits the vision for a tourism business of the future, which Balloch and the wider Loch Lomond area could truly benefit from.
“We welcomed this latest feedback from the Park Authority and much of it aligned with what we were hearing from the community. We got to work to modify the proposals accordingly with our partners by removing Area 10, retaining more trees, bringing down lodge and bothy numbers and ensuring an overall higher net biodiversity gain.”
Paterson also claimed that “the opposition” were using concern about traffic and parking as a “scaremongering tool” and said the new proposal provided more information about parking strategy and traffic statistics.
He went on: “Whilst we do appreciate the road network is an ongoing concern for those living around the A82, our surveys have indicated that the development simply will not bring the concentrated numbers at peak times that it is being accused of and we have mitigated this further by introducing measures such as staggered check-in and check-out times to ensure this is not the case.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes puts out statement on 'hurt' caused amid equalities row
“All traffic surveys submitted to our statutory consultees West Dunbartonshire Council Roads Department have, to date, been satisfactory. We have also submitted a comprehensive parking strategy to the National Park and conducted further surveys through peak seasons to submit to the Parks Authority. Alongside this, we have made a number of commitments to join working groups to look at sustainable travel planning and eco-travel at the venue, to help ease congestion for the longer term.”
Scottish Greens MSP Ross Greer has previously called for the project to be scrapped, calling it a “garish, oversized and totally inappropriate development”.
He told The National: "These revisions show just how flawed Flamingo Land's plans have always been.
"They are also quite clearly a response to both the overwhelming public opposition and to the detailed letter of objection submitted by my team. In short, we've got them on the run.
"This is far from over, though. We may have saved the ancient woodland, but what the developers are proposing is still totally inappropriate and will lead to extra congestion and a strain on local services, never mind the huge impact it will have on the local landscape.
"People in Balloch and the surrounding communities will see through these revised proposals, just as they have with every previous attempt. Over 40,00 people have lodged objections and surveys show local residents are opposed by a margin of three to one.
"If we are to protect the world-famous natural landscape of Loch Lomond then we need to see off Flamingo Land once and for all.
"Loch Lomond is one of the jewels in Scotland's crown. Putting an exclusive resort right at the gateway to the Loch would be a huge step backwards."
Following the submission, a 30-day consultation period will take place before Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park Authority decide whether the application will progress.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel