WHETHER or not a legal challenge against the Metropolitan Police’s failure to investigate Boris Johnson thoroughly during the Partygate scandal can proceed is set to be decided in the High Court.
A bid is aiming to make the London police answer to why they didn’t bother to send questionnaires about two law-breaking events to the disgraced former prime minister – despite junior government staff being fined for attending those same events.
The action is being brought by Good Law Project and Brian Paddick, a LibDem peer and former deputy assistant commissioner with the Met Police.
READ MORE: Boris Johnson 'didn't know he was at a party', Tory minister claims
Jo Maugham, director of Good Law Project, said: “We can't understand – and the Met won't disclose – how Boris Johnson dodged fines for going to parties that junior civil servants were fined for attending. But what it looks like is special treatment for the powerful.
“I don't care about Johnson. And nor do I care about £100 fines. What I do care about is the rule of law. It must apply without fear or favour – or everything will fall into the sea."
Paddick said: “My sole motivation is to ensure everyone is treated fairly and equally under the law as a result of the police carrying out their duty without fear or favour. Many fined for breaching lockdown rules will find this difficult to believe without further explanation from the Metropolitan Police.”
The High Court will decide on Wednesday whether or not the hearing can proceed.
Good Law Project said their case focuses on the Met Police’s failure to even send questionnaires – their primary method of investigating Partygate events – to Johnson regarding two lockdown gatherings that he attended in November and December 2020.
A number of civil servants and officials who took part in these events were sent questionnaires and ultimately fined.
It is the second time that Good Law Project has taken legal action against the Met over Partygate.
In January 2021, the force U-turned on its initial decision not to investigate the parties held in No 10 Downing Street and Whitehall after Good Law Project issued legal proceedings.
Ultimately, the investigation led to the issuing of 126 fines for law-breaking to 83 individuals. Johnson and then chancellor Rishi Sunak were just two of those individuals.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel