Kate Forbes has been tipped as a possible contender to take over from Humza Yousaf as SNP leader.
Some political commentators have speculated that her religious beliefs could put her at odds with progressive members in the party.
Forbes is a member of the Free Church of Scotland, an evangelical breakaway from the mainstream Church of Scotland, formed originally in 1843.
However, Forbes has not aligned herself with every doctrine of her church, previously suggesting she does not adhere to the Free Church’s Westminster Confession and attitudes toward Roman Catholics.
She said previously: “I make my own decisions on the basis of what decision is right and wrong, according to my faith, not according to the diktat of any church.”
READ MORE: LIVE: Humza Yousaf announces resignation as First Minister
What is the Free Church and what are its beliefs?
The Free Church was created as a protest against state encroachment on the spiritual independence of the Kirk and is sometimes known as “The Wee Frees”. It is the second-largest denomination after the national Church of Scotland.
It first emerged in 1843 when around a third of ministers in the Church of Scotland resigned because of state interference, later known as The Disruption. In 1900, the majority of the Free Church joined with the United Presbyterian Church, but around 27 ministers and 100 congregations refused to join the union.
The Presbyterian group said its primary motivation is to “make disciples” and teach from the Bible. It claims to have over 100 congregations across Scotland and 13,000 members.
Its website reads: “We believe that the Bible is God’s Word and that it should be central in all that we do.
“It tells us about Him, about the world in which we live, about ourselves and, most importantly, about the good news of Jesus and how he has come to rescue us from sin and death.
“Everything from our patterns of worship to our church structures seeks to reflect clear Biblical teaching.”
Former Free Church moderator Rev David Robertson previously compared abortion to slavery, and the denomination has an anti-abortion stance on moral grounds.
In 2015, after abortion law was devolved to Holyrood, Robertson called on MSPs to debate the time limit claiming Scots will look back at the “evil” of terminations with the same horror as historical disgraces such as slavery.
READ MORE: Who should replace Humza Yousaf as SNP leader? Have your say
What has Kate Forbes said about her religious beliefs in the past?
It is understood that some in the SNP wouldn't support Forbes's becoming FM in a parliamentary vote, with some of her past remarks surfacing following the news of Sturgeon’s resignation last year.
She told a prayer breakfast in 2018, while a backbencher, that politicians should recognise the treatment of the “unborn” was a measure of “true progress”.
In May 2021, she told a BBC Political Thinking podcast: “I am a person before I was a politician and that person will continue to believe that I am made in the image of God.”
When running for leadership in 2023, Forbes said she would have voted against gay marriage as an “matter of conscience”.
She went on: “But I would have respected and defended the democratic choice that was made. It is legal right now and I am a servant of democracy, I am not a dictator.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel