A SCOTTISH Labour MSP has branded Gordon Brown’s report on the future of the UK as “stale” and “irrelevant”.
Former deputy leader Alex Rowley also accused his own party of trying to ignore the constitution as an issue.
This comes ahead of the party’s conference in Edinburgh.
Former prime minister Brown was asked by Keir Starmer to chair a commission on the future of the Union.
READ MORE: John Curtice on what Nicola Sturgeon's SNP must do to win independence
Key recommendations included abolishing the “indefensible” House of Lords and more powers for devolved nations including Scotland.
Both are ideas which have been floated several times in the past by Labour but not delivered on.
The Daily Record reports that senior figures in Scottish Labour want to see Starmer commit to an ambitious programme of devolution should he be elected as prime minister.
In an article for Red Paper Collective, Rowley was critical of his party’s approach arguing that the debate on independence suited the Tories and SNP at the expense of Labour.
He wrote: “So, whilst both these parties use the constitutional question to win over voters, the general approach from Labour since the 2014 referendum has been ‘don’t mention the constitution’.
“Labour believes it can rise above a petty dispute over independence and, despite all the evidence to the contrary, the line tends to be that people are more interested in the NHS, in education and in day-to-day life than they are in the constitution.”
On Brown’s report, he added: “Whilst there was much to welcome, and indeed much at a UK level that would support greater devolution in Scotland, the report does not acknowledge how much further Scotland is down the road of devolution when compared with its neighbours and, as such, fails to address the need for a new settlement between Scotland and the rest of the UK.
“Therefore, the report appears stale on delivery, irrelevant to a Scotland that has already been debating the merits of further devolution or, indeed, independence, for over a decade at a national level.”
A Scottish Labour spokesperson told the Record that “Alex Rowley is not Scottish Labour’s Constitution spokesperson”.
Rowley, an MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, backed “greater” borrowing levers and the devolution of immigration powers as examples of the next stage of devolution.
READ MORE: SNP reject report 30,000 have quit party over Nicola Sturgeon gender reforms
SNP MSP Rona Mackay said: "It’s telling how divided Scottish Labour is on the constitution when Alex Rowley – a key lieutenant of Gordon Brown for many years – dismisses his old boss’s plans as stale and irrelevant.
"The big reveal planned for this weekend has already been undermined.
"This is the same cauld kale het again that Brown has been trying to flog for years now. Labour stalwart Rowley is stating the bleeding obvious by confirming what we already knew – Labour has nothing to offer Scotland now or in the future.
READ MORE: Police Scotland officer Martyn Coulter acquitted of rape
“The simple fact is that no amount of constitutional tinkering will undo the damage of this hard Brexit – which Labour now supports as vehemently as the Tories.
“But instead of recognising and respecting Scotland’s democratic right to choose an independent future, the Labour party will impose whatever ineffectual and futile plan Brown trots out - even if the people of Scotland overwhelmingly reject Labour at the next election.
"They really are no better than the Tories.
“Scotland’s only route back to the EU is to become an independent country.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel