MICHAEL Gove joined secret cross-party talks to address the failings of Brexit, according to reports.
Senior members of Labour’s front bench, including shadow foreign secretary David Lammy, were also present at the talks at Ditchley Park in Oxfordshire, The Observer reported.
The secret talks were to address the issues which the UK is facing due to Brexit and how to find solutions which are in the national interest.
READ MORE: Why has the UK public turned against Brexit in record numbers?
The meeting, held under the title “How can we make Brexit work better with our neighbours in Europe?”, also included the heads of some of the UK’s biggest banks and business.
The Observer reported that papers from the summit spoke of how the Brexit deal might “be optimised now and amended later”, and asked how trade between the UK and European bloc could “be better managed”.
With both Labour and the Tories having firmly ruled out rejoining the EU, the summit focused instead on making Brexit work and included prominent Leave and Remain campaigners.
Senior Labour figures are said to be concerned that Brexit will hamper their chances of success in government if they take power after the next General Election.
Other figures at the summit, according to the Observer, were Goldman Sachs director and former chief Brexit negotiator Oliver Robbins, GlaxoSmithKline chair John Symonds, top Nato figure Angus Lapsley, Labour grandee Peter Mandelson, former Tory party leader Michael Howard, and former Tory chancellor Norman Lamont.
It comes as record levels of people in the UK turn against the idea of Brexit, according to polling.
In January, YouGov released a poll of some 616 Britains who had voted for Brexit in 2016 but since changed their minds.
The firm found a general sense that things have gotten worse since the EU referendum was the primary factor for people turning against Brexit, with 25% of people citing it as their reason for a change of heart.
Almost one in five (19%) said the state of the economy, with rising costs and bills, had led them to U-turn on their Brexit vote.
And one in 10 (11%) said it was because they felt they had been lied to by the Leave campaign, or that the results of Brexit had not been what they were expecting.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel