THE Daily Telegraph is facing criticism for its decision to publish a picture taken by the family of Ghislaine Maxwell, which attempts to discredit the accusations of sexual assault levelled at Prince Andrew.
The photograph, which is featured on the front page of today’s Daily Telegraph, shows two fully clothed people sitting in a bath with pictures of Prince Andrew and his accuser Virginia Giuffre covering their faces.
The Duke of York reached a multi-million pound settlement with Giuffre last February after she accused him of three incidents of rape and sexual abuse, which occurred when she was 17-years-old in 2001.
In 2011, Giuffre described one of the incidents, which she said occurred in Ghislaine Maxwell’s house in central London, where Prince Andrew licked her toes in the bath before taking her into the bedroom to have sex.
TELEGRAPH: The photo that ‘clears Duke’ over bath sex #TomorrowsPapersToday pic.twitter.com/lVpkcKol2q
— Neil Henderson (@hendopolis) January 27, 2023
In her unpublished memoir she described the bathroom as having a “beige marble tiled floor with a porcelain Victorian-style bathtub in the middle of the room.”
However, Ghislaine Maxwell’s older brother Ian Maxwell has now released the images in an attempt to discredit Giuffre’s story.
He told The Telegraph: “I am releasing my photographs now because the truth needs to come out.
“They show conclusively that the bath is too small for any sort of sex frolicking. There is no ‘Victorian bath’, as Giuffre has claimed, which is proved both by the attached plan of the bathroom and the photos themselves”.
It comes after reports suggested that Prince Andrew has consulted lawyers in the US in a bid to overturn to the settlement he struck with Giuffre.
#OTD 28 Jan 2023: The Daily Telegraph has given up any pretence of being a serious newspaper. There is no comeback from this front page story trying to offer cover for serial sex trafficker Prince Andrew. The Tele is now like the Daily Sport without the humour; mad & dangerous. pic.twitter.com/i9QWkHm6n4
— Gerry Hassan 🇺🇦 (@GerryHassan) January 28, 2023
The Telegraph’s decision to publish the image on their front page has been broadly denounced on social media.
Professor of Social Change at Glasgow Caledonian University and The National columnist Gerry Hassan said: “The Daily Telegraph has given up any pretence of being a serious newspaper.
“There is no comeback from this front page story trying to offer cover for serial sex trafficker Prince Andrew.
“The Tele is now like the Daily Sport without the humour: mad & dangerous.”
Jo Grady, the general secretary of the University and College Union, tweeted: “Can we take a moment to acknowledge this for what it is?
Can we take a moment to acknowledge this for what it is?
— Jo Grady (@DrJoGrady) January 28, 2023
It is the continued harassment of a survivor of sexual violence.
It is a continued attempt to humiliate and undermine her.
It is a sick representation of rape culture in the UK.
It’s continued abuse, it isn’t funny. https://t.co/1ZELnTFQo6
“It is continued harassment of a survivor of sexual violence. It is a continued attempt to humiliate and undermine her.
“It is a sick representation of rape culture in the UK. It’s continued abuse, it isn’t funny.”
Historian Otto English said: “My parents used to take the Telegraph. It always had some slightly bonkers moments but this feels like Express territory in the Diana conspiracy years.”
Republican campaign group Our Republic described the front page as “stomach-churning”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel