FIONA Bruce has been accused of defending Tory party chairman Nadhim Zahawi’s tax affairs on Question Time.
After it emerged Zahawi had paid a penalty to HMRC to resolve a multimillion-pound dispute, the matter was up for discussion on the BBC’s Thursday night politics show.
But Bruce provoked a backlash when she was debating Zahawi’s situation with Russian-British political commentator Konstantin Kisin after the boss of HMRC, Jim Harra, said there were no penalties for innocent tax errors.
Kisin said: “The boss of HMRC said today innocent people don’t pay penalties.”
Bruce replied: “Let me just be completely clear; there are no penalties for innocent errors in your tax affairs, that’s what he said.”
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Gender reform critics using debate to 'cloak' bigotry
Kisin then said: “So we can conclude from that it wasn’t an innocent error then?”
Bruce hit back with: “He wasn’t specifically talking about Nadhim Zahawi, he was just talking generally.”
Kisin replied: “But Nadhim Zahawi paid a penalty, so it was not an innocent error? Can we agree on that?”
Bruce then simply put her hands in the air said her opinion didn’t count.
Extraordinary the lengths Fiona Bruce goes to ensure that her Tory paymasters are not criticized on question time - the BBC really disappoint me these days #BBCQT https://t.co/5B0KXweZpu
— Alyson Barnes (@AlysonDBarnes) January 26, 2023
The exchange led to accusations she was defending Zahawi, as she didn’t appear to agree with Kisin that he hadn’t made an innocent error.
The Prime Minister has asked new ethics adviser Sir Laurie Magnus to assess whether the former chancellor breached the ministerial code with the HMRC settlement.
Alyson Barnes, the leader of Rossendale Borough Council in Lancashire, said on Twitter she felt Bruce was going to “extraordinary lengths” to defend “her Tory paymasters”.
He full tweet read: “Extraordinary the lengths Fiona Bruce goes to ensure that her Tory paymasters are not criticized on Question Time - the BBC really disappoint me these days.”
“From Matt Hancock to Boris Johnson to now Nadhim Zahawi and lots of others. I just really struggle to understand how we can trust the Conservative Party?”
— BBC Question Time (@bbcquestiontime) January 26, 2023
This #bbcqt audience member shares her view on Nadhim Zahawi’s tax affairs https://t.co/AQDswewAm4 pic.twitter.com/HDI6D4VtlJ
Elsewhere on the show, an audience member who was a GP questioned whether the Tory party can be trusted as she listed a number of individuals who had been involved in scandals over the past couple of years.
She said to former Tory party chairman Jake Berry: “We’ve had so many incidents from Matt Hancock to Boris Johnson to now Nadhim Zahawi and lots of others. I just really struggle to understand how we can trust the Conservative Party?”
Berry also insisted during the show that Zahawi’s position was unsustainable while an investigation was going on.
The BBC has been approached for comment by The National.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel