IF proof were ever needed that Scots is a distinct language from English then one Conservative MP’s attempt to recite Robert Burns in the House of Commons could surely be used as a prime example.
During an exchange with SNP MP Deidre Brock, leader of the House of Commons and former candidate for prime minister Penny Mordaunt reached for the words of Scotland’s bard in an ill-advised attempt to appear versed in Scottish culture.
Brock had asked Mordaunt why several pieces of UK Government legislation were stuck in “parliamentary purgatory” with little progress being made in terms of scrutiny from MPs.
She said: “Now, of course, the Government always has bucketloads of lame excuses for legislative hold-ups but I think we know the true reason.
“A couple of weeks ago the leader rather bravely tried to suggest a comparison between her party, completely engulfed in sleaze and scandal, and mine. A case of whataboutery so bold it should make a sailor blush.”
Never one to shirk an opportunity for public humiliation, Mordaunt looked to the Burns poem To A Louse in a predictably glib deflection from actually answering Brock’s question.
She said: “The honourable lady again invites comparisons. And I hope she will forgive me but I can’t go past this exchange without quoting Rabbie Burns.
“'O wad some Pow’r the giftie gie us. To see oursels as others see us!'
“I’m sure the Honourable Lady and her colleagues could deliver that much better than I.”
Brock’s reaction of pained schadenfreude indicated just how successful Mordaunt’s attempt at Scots had been.
READ MORE: SNP MP asked Alister Jack to find 'resolution' to Scotland's gender reforms
While Brock may originally hail from Australia, the Jouker reckons her years living in Scotland make her a more than sufficient judge of Mordaunt’s butchered effort.
This is all without even confronting the irony of a Tory MP quoting a poem which shatters pretensions about social class and espouses the nobility of egalitarianism.
Though there is one line that the Conservative Party may find of use in their policies regarding free school meals.
“Gae somewhere else and seek your dinner. On some poor body.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel