THE Labour Party have reported former prime minister Boris Johnson to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards.
It comes following allegations that BBC chairman Richard Sharp helped Johnson to guarantee a loan of up to £800,000 just weeks before he was selected for his current position.
Labour chair Anneliese Dodds has written to Daniel Greenberg CB, who is set to become the parliamentary commissioner for standards, raising concerns about the reports and suggested it could have constituted a breach of the Code of Conduct for MPs.
Dodds said: “The financial affairs of this disgraced former prime minister just keep getting murkier, dragging the Conservative Party deeper into yet another quagmire of sleaze.
“Serious questions need to be asked of Johnson: why has this money never been declared, and what exactly did he promise these very generous friends in return for such lavish loans?”
The Sunday Times reported that Sharp was involved in talks about financing Johnson’s Downing Street lifestyle in November and December 2020.
It is said that Canadian businessman Sam Blyth, a distant cousin of Johnson, raised the idea of acting as the former prime minister’s guarantor and reportedly asked Sharp for advice on the best way forward.
The paper reported that the now BBC chairman agreed to help introduce Blyth to Simon Case, the cabinet secretary and head of the civil service shortly after.
In Dodds’ letter to Greenberg, the MP for Oxford East said that the “lack of transparency” on the issue could “call into question the process by which the chairman of the BBC was appointed” – as this selection was in its final stages at the time.
Meanwhile, the SNP has also called for an independent inquiry, with Kirsty Blackman saying the situation “reeks of Tory sleaze”.
“The UK Government must establish an independent inquiry to assess the circumstances of this loan, the propriety of the arrangement, the ethics of the appointment, and whether any rules were broken by Johnson, the UK Government, or the BBC chairman”, she said.
A BBC spokesman said: “The BBC plays no role in the recruitment of the chair and any questions are a matter for the government.”
In response to the report, Sharp said: “There is not a conflict when I simply connected, at his request, Mr Blyth with the cabinet secretary and had no further involvement whatsoever.”
A spokesman for Johnson told the newspaper the report was “rubbish” and that “Sharp “has never given any financial advice to Boris Johnson, nor has Mr Johnson sought any financial advice from him”.
READ MORE: 'Debatable' Tories had right to block trans law reforms, expert says
They added: “There has never been any remuneration or compensation to Mr Sharp from Boris Johnson for this or any other service.
“Mr Johnson did indeed have dinner with Mr Sharp, whom he has known for almost 20 years, and with his cousin. So what? Big deal.
“All Mr Johnson’s financial arrangements have been properly declared and registered on the advice of officials.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel