THE NHS “must be maintained on its founding principles”, Scotland’s Health Secretary has said after Sajid Javid called for patients to be charged to visit GPs and A&Es.
Writing in The Times, the former UK Government health secretary argued that the current free-at-the-point-of-need NHS model is “unsustainable”.
Javid called for a “grown-up, hard-headed conversation” about revamping the health service, noting that “too often the appreciation for the NHS has become a religious fervour and a barrier to reform”.
Downing Street said that the Prime Minister is not “currently” looking at the proposals, which could see patients required to pay £20 to see their GP or over £60 for an A&E trip.
The Scottish Government said out its opposition to the suggestions. As health is devolved, any decision like charging patients for care would be a matter for Holyrood.
“The Scottish Government’s policy could not be clearer, our National Health Service must be maintained on its founding principles – publicly owned, publicly operated, and free at the point of need,” Health Secretary Humza Yousaf said.
READ MORE: Scottish independence poll gives Yes a HUGE lead amid gender bill row
“The provision of health services must always be based on the individual needs of a patient – and any suggestion that this should in some way be based on ability to pay is abhorrent.”
He added: “These principles are not up for debate or discussion.”
Meanwhile, Javid’s comments sparked heavy criticism from Labour’s shadow health secretary.
Wes Streeting tweeted “over my dead body” in response to Javid’s proposals.
“An NHS free at the point of use has been its central equitable principle for 75 years. Patients should never have to worry about the bill,” he said.
READ MORE: Anger as Wes Streeting launches attack on the BMA health union
However, Streeting has said that reform is required within the health service as various challenges mount up.
He told The Guardian: “In recent elections, the left has given a lot of people the impression the answer to everything is to pour more money in. Of course investment is needed in the NHS, but ask any patient about their miserable experiences and it’s partly about culture and systems. That’s got to change too.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel