A SCOTTISH Greens MSP has raised concerns that the growing "toxic" row over the UK Government blocking Scotland’s gender reforms will be “hell” for transgender Scots.
On Monday night, Scottish Secretary Alister Jack announced that the Westminster Tories would deploy a never before used section 35 order to stop the Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill from being given Royal Assent.
The move caused fury amongst those who saw it as an attack on Scottish devolution. on Tuesday Social Justice Secretary Shona Robison, who sponsored the bill as it moved through Parliament, told MSPs the UK Government intervened simply because they “don’t like” the legislation.
READ MORE: LIVE: Fallout continues over UK gender reform block
Maggie Chapman MSP, the Scottish Greens equalities spokesperson, agreed. Scotland has its own policies on nuclear power although energy policy is a reserved matter, and the UK has done nothing to intervene, she recalled.
“They are doing this because it's about trans people, because it's on an equalities issue and about a minority group, that is despicable,” she said.
Speaking in her parliamentary office shortly after Jack had laid the Section 35 order in the House of Commons, Chapman fumed that the Scottish Secretary couldn’t articulate the UK Government’s reasoning for why the gender reforms allegedly impact women’s rights, as has repeatedly been claimed by opponents of the legislation.
She said: “He couldn't do it. He was asked specifically by Scottish MPs what the issue was, and he couldn't answer. He couldn't answer that question."
Chapman added: “I suppose that the concern that I have around this issue more broadly is that because it has become so toxic, and it's become so awful for trans people.
"Actually using a Section 35 rather than a Section 33, which would take it straight to the Supreme Court, I think the UK Government has done that because that prolongs it even further.
“That's just really shitty for trans people.
“That’s a really awful thing to do to trans people, because you are saying actually, we are going to use the mechanism that will draw this out for the longest possible time, and it will be trans people who will suffer.”
“My heart goes out to trans people and trans allies and friends and family affected because it's going to be hell,” Chapman added.
Last week, opponents of the gender reforms gathered outside of the Scottish Parliament to protest the bill passing, with counter-protesters and activists also trying to make their voices heard.
It escalated to an incident where one opponent of the reforms accused supporters of being “paedophiles”. Chapman said she has fears that the UK Government’s decision will legitimatise this kind of behaviour against the LGBT community.
The MSP said that while she expects abuse as a politician, it’s “inappropriate” for the same abuse to be levelled at trans people.
READ MORE: First Minister: 'Inevitable' row over gender bill will go to court
During the three long days of debate at the last stage of the reforms, Tory MSPs used numerous delaying tactics to push it into the long grass. They called multiple points of order, moved amendments that Labour MSPs had dropped, and tried to have the parliamentary timetable changed to push the bill into 2023.
Reflecting on this, Chapman likened the strategy to opposition MPs in Westminster. She added that the tactics and response from the UK Government and Labour leader Keir Starmer over the reforms will reaffirm for many that “Westminster doesn’t understand Scotland”.
She added: “That's not good for the Union.
“I remember after the 2014 independence referendum there were all sorts of warm, positive statements from Labour and the Conservatives saying that Scotland should stay part of the Union and lead the Union.
“What happens when we try to lead the Union on equalities issues?
“The right-wing, reactionary, Conservative government turns round and says, ‘No, you can’t.”
However, the Scottish Greens MSP believes the move will backfire on the Tories, and voters will see the attempt to stoke a "culture war" as the "bad faith tactic" that it is.
READ MORE: UK Government sets out five key reasons for gender reform block
She added: “It’s a very clear marker of a growing distinctiveness in our political cultures, and in our valuing of difference and diversity and equalities issues.
“More than two-thirds of Scottish parliamentarians supported this reform, if we are the same culture, if we are the same country, why isn't that reflected in Westminster?
“Because it’s not and we’re not.”
Asked if she was confident that a showdown between the Scottish and UK Government over the reforms in the court would result in a ruling in Holyrood’s favour, she said: “I am hopeful.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel