YOUNG people who voted in local and Scottish Parliament elections for the first time at the age of 16 are more likely to retain the habit than older first-time voters, a study suggests.
Those able to vote at 16 and 17 in Scotland were more likely to continue the habit of voting well into their 20s than those who were over 18, researchers at the Universities of Edinburgh and Sheffield said.
Research was funded by a grant from the Scottish Government.
The voting age was reduced to 16 in Scottish local and parliamentary elections as well as the 2014 independence election.
Experts now say the voting age should be reduced to 16 across the rest of the UK. But while first-time voters maintained a habit of voting, researchers said there was no longer-term effects of participating in politics more widely such as signing petitions or attending demonstrations.
Inequalities in voter turnout among those from lower socio-economic backgrounds were reduced when voting aged 16 or 17, but these trends were not maintained as voters got older and standard patterns re-emerged as they moved into their 20s.
Lowering the voting age has had a positive impact on civic education. Those who had taken subjects such as Modern Studies at school voted in larger numbers as they grew older.
Researchers surveyed 904 young people between the age of 16 and 31 about their voting habits after the 2021 Scottish Parliament elections.
Data was compared from young people who could vote at 16 in the referendum on Scottish independence in 2014 or the Scottish Parliament elections in 2016 or 2021 to young people whose first vote was at 18 in general, local or Scottish Parliament elections since 2010.
Dr Jan Eichhorn, of the University of Edinburgh’s School of Social and Political Science, lead author of the study said: “Allowing 16 and 17-year-olds to vote was a good decision taken by the Scottish Parliament.
“Many younger first-time voters retain a habit of voting and participate in greater numbers than older first-time voters. The findings strengthen the case for enfranchising younger voters across the UK to improve long term voting behaviour.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel