THE sound of music seems to be everywhere now from supermarkets to doctors’ surgeries but the effect on listeners subjected to the tunes may not be quite what is intended.
That’s the conclusion of psychologist Zoe Nendick who has studied why music is played in public places and how it influences behaviour.
The results may be surprising for those, like local authorities, who pay millions of pounds in royalties every year in order to play music to visitors and staff.
The spending has been criticised after it emerged that cash-strapped councils across the UK paid £190 million last year alone to bodies such as music licensing company PPL PRS. The money is distributed to songwriters and music publishers for the use of their tunes.
The sums have been blasted by the Taxpayers’ Alliance who said taxpayers would be “furious their cash was being wasted after constantly hearing public sector bosses say there’s no more fat left to trim”.
Examples of the kind of places covered by the licences include children’s, family, community and leisure centres, town halls, museums, shopping malls, bus stations and tourist information centres.
However, Nendick has warned that the music may not be achieving the intended effect.
She said a key reason for playing music in public spaces was to influence behaviour as it is thought to have a calming effect – but this could backfire as it could cause some people to become overstimulated. In cases like these the sound of silence could be preferable to the sound of music, according to Nendick.
As public buildings are supposed to be accessible, an easy way to help achieve this is by turning the music off, she said.
“If there is too much going on it can cause some people to be overstimulated so removing music is actually a way of making places more acceptable and comfortable for people to be in,” said Nendick.
“A key reason for playing music is to cause people to feel calm but actually it turns out that this works better if people can control the music they listen to.”
READ MORE: SNP National Executive Committee has agreed the wording of resolution
Rather than play music they may not want to hear, she said it could be more effective to have a silent space where people could put in their earphones and choose the music they want.
“The music that makes one person feel calm may not make another feel calm,” she pointed out. “It has been proven people prefer it when they can listen to their own music.”
Nendick added: “There are benefits for local authorities to have silence in public areas to make these spaces more welcoming, or accessible and also to avoid giving people unpredictable responses to music.
“A certain piece could trigger a memory for someone and end up upsetting or angering them or reminding them of a situation that made them very tense or a person they don’t want to be reminded of. You don’t know how people will react to the music you play so it is to your advantage if people play their own music and keep calm and focused on why they are there.”
Music played in children’s areas will also have an effect on their behaviour.
“If it is loud and energetic music then children are bound to be more loud and energetic and that might not necessarily be what you want,” said Nendick. “Something to bear in mind in these places is the choice of music.”
Music played in places like health clinics and hospital waiting rooms may also be having an unintended effect.
“Reducing anxiety in medical settings is definitely a reason music is played in those places but, having delved into it, that seems to be more of an assumption on the part of these places rather than a proven effect,” she said. “There is some evidence it can reduce anxiety in medical settings but it is mixed, I would say.”
Supermarkets and shopping centres all tend to play music as it is well established that music can affect consumer attitudes, their selections and the time and money they spend.
Classical music, in particular, has been found to create an impression of a sophisticated atmosphere, which can increase the amount of money consumers spend. One study concluded that people choose more expensive wine in a restaurant when classical music is being played, while another found that people spend more money and more time dining out when classical music is played than when there is pop music or no music. Slow music also increases the time spent in a restaurant.
Music has also been used to discourage anti-social behaviour and there is evidence that this can work. An experiment where classical music was played on London underground led to a decrease in assaults on staff and robberies.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here