AN independent Scotland would follow in the footsteps of Sweden by joining Nato while rejecting being a permanent site for nuclear weapons, the SNP have said.
Sweden is set to join the military alliance next month but Pal Johnson, the country’s defence minister, has ruled out permanent bases including deployment of the alliance’s nuclear arsenal.
Anti-independence campaigners have said the SNP’s opposition to Trident could stand in the way of Scotland joining Nato but the party will be reassured by the position Sweden has taken.
READ MORE: Brexit anniversary: Message to Europe to keep the light on for Scots
Sweden and Finland are expected to join Nato by the end of next month once Turkey ratifies their membership application with the latter also expected to set conditions on nuclear weapons after polling showed public opposition.
Dave Doogan, the SNP defence spokesperson at Westminster, told a recent meeting of the Nato parliamentary assembly in Washington that it needed to “recognise the benefits of Finland and Sweden joining Nato far outweigh any principled domestic stance on hosting or sharing obligations or commitments.”
On Thursday, Doogan said: “The idea that states — applicant or members — could be somehow coerced to become host states against their will is anathema to the democratic foundations of Nato.
“For Scotland’s part, Nato membership is at the core of our independent defence and security posture, adding value, plurality and capability together with our incredibly important geostrategic location. Like Sweden, Scotland will not host nuclear weapons.”
READ MORE: Rishi Sunak in Scotland to 'strengthen' relationship with Nicola Sturgeon
Doogan said saying no to being a nuclear host would not diminish the country’s value to Nato.
The Scottish Greens – the other pro-independence party at Holyrood - are against joining Nato.
Given the SNP’s policy of removing Trident from the Clyde within three years of any vote for independence, Doogan said it was “inconceivable” they would then invite nuclear weapons in as an independent actor.
Officials said Sweden would follow Nato’s “enhanced forward presence” model in the Baltic states, which involves the deployment of troops on rotation rather than creating permanent bases.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel