SCOTLAND’S production of oil and gas will “effectively end” in the next 20 years - and ministers will consider speeding this up, the Energy Secretary has said.
Michael Matheson outlined a new strategy that includes seeking views for “more robust climate compatibility” checks for oil and gas fields that are licensed but not developed, and a presumption of no new exploration in the North Sea.
The proposals clash with the UK Government which announced a new licensing round to allow exploration for fossil fuels in the North Sea in October, despite concerns from climate campaigners.
Matheson also warned Westminster must not be allowed to play the “same trick” of failing to invest tax revenues from the North Sea back into Scotland when it comes to the country’s renewable energy resources.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: 'Imperative' for Scotland to shift from fossil fuels
The Scottish Government’s draft strategy says it aims to support the fastest possible just transition for the oil and gas sector to secure a “bright future” for a revitalised North Sea energy sector focused on renewables.
Matheson told MSPs it contained the first results of independent research on the future role of North Sea oil and gas in Scotland.
He said: “This work shows that, as an increasingly mature basin, production in the North Sea is expected to be around a third of 1999 levels by 2035 and less than 3% of the 1999 peak by 2050.
“That projection takes account of the remaining potential development in the North Sea and is without any political decision to reduce consumption due to the climate emergency.
“This means that domestic production will effectively end within the next 20 years if we do nothing. The draft strategy is consulting on whether we should act faster than this.”
But he warned: “Whatever people’s position on the pace at which we move away from fossil fuels, a failure to act now to deliver a just transformation of our energy system would be to neglect our energy security, the future of our economy and risk the kind of damage to industrial communities we saw in the 1980s.”
READ MORE: North Sea Transition Authority could grant more than 100 oil drilling licenses
The key ambitions outlined in the strategy include producing at least 20 gigawatts (GW) of additional renewable energy capacity by 2030 – which Matheson said could generate around 50% of Scotland’s total energy demand.
There is also an aim for hydrogen to provide 5GW – or the equivalent of 15% of current energy needs – by that time, rising to 25GW hydrogen production capacity by 2045.
Scottish Tory energy spokesman Liam Kerr accused the Scottish Government of ignoring the UK Government’s £16billion North Sea Transition Deal and questioned whether a presumption against new exploration in the North Sea would mean “shutting the industry down prematurely”.
In response, Matheson said the Scottish Government was investing half a billion of pounds in Moray and the north-east of Scotland to support the transition.
He added: “That is the type of investment that will support the transition – what we have had repeatedly from Westminster governments is taking the tax revenue from oil and gas but not investing the money back into the north-east of Scotland and the rest of our economy.
READ MORE: UK Government urged to halt Rosebank oil field exploration
“What we can’t afford to let happen this time round with renewable energy is to allow that same trick to be played on the people of Scotland, to ensure the investment we see into our renewables sector gets the economic benefits that should be delivered here in Scotland.”
Matheson said he will be inviting the UK Government to join an energy transition delivery group to drive the plans forward.
Green MSP Mark Ruskell said: “The science of climate change demands that North Sea oil and gas is phased out, this is the right thing to do for people and planet.
“Today’s Scotland’s energy strategy abandons the dogma of maximum economy recovery of oil and gas and sets a path to a renewable future that leaves no workers behind.
“The UK Government must follow Scotland’s lead.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel