THE latest release of files from the National Archives in Kew have revealed new insights into the important business of government.
But it’s also given a glimpse into what went on behind-the-scenes of Tony Blair’s government.
Of course with New Labour image was everything - and none more so when there were TV cameras around.
A memo on a Cabinet “away day” dated September 1998, from chief of staff Jonathan Powell, contained information on the discussions taking place, specified the provision of a buffet lunch – and gave strict instructions on the appropriate attire.
“TV will film people arriving and going so there can be no woolly jumpers,” Powell warned before the meeting.
READ MORE: William Hague urged Tony Blair to delay Scottish devolution referendum
The annual Cabinet “away days” became something of a tradition under Blair’s Labour government – but not one that everyone enjoyed, the files show.
Senior ministers would gather at the prime minister’s official country residence at Chequers in early September to discuss politics and policy ahead of the party conference season.
However by 2000 some were questioning their value, with David Miliband, then a Number 10 special adviser, complaining that no company would run them in such a haphazard fashion.
“The tradition of a TB/GB (Tony Blair/Gordon Brown) introduction and then one disjointed comment from each Cabinet member is pretty ghastly – and not very useful,” he said in a memo.
The files also reveal how culture secretary Chris Smith had to be “airbrushed in” to the 2000 annual cabinet photograph after he was unable to attend in person requiring a change in the seating plan, according to files released to the National Archives.
One Number 10 official wrote: “It follows the customary order of precedence, except Chris Smith (No 9) is swapped with Clare Short (No 11).
“I have done this because Mr Smith won’t be present and we will need to airbrush in his image from the 1999 photo.
“He was on the back row last time and so must be again if the airbrushing is going to work.”
And sometimes, it’s the little things that can trigger the issuing of stern words from the government, the newly released files show.
READ MORE: Sean Connery: Papers tell of talks with actor on support for devolution
A memo from Downing Street official Angus Lapsley in November 1997 raised the important issue of missing chairs. And no, not the kind that take on the important role of overseeing meetings.
“For at least three weeks in a row now the number of chairs around the Cabinet Table has been wrong, with the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport the usual victim (there is a place set, but no chair),” the note fumed.
“Yesterday we only managed on the other side of the table because the Social Security Secretary did not turn up.”
It added: “Could you also note that there should be five seats against the wall dividing the Cabinet Room from the Private Office.
“Sometimes there are only four.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel