A CONSERVATIVE MP has been challenged by one of the UK’s leading health charities over his claims it is involved in a cover-up over Covid vaccines.
Andrew Bridgen, the MP for North West Leicestershire, has campaigned for a halt to Covid vaccinations, claiming they caused heart problems.
He claimed in parliament that a senior figure in the British Heart Foundation was involved in “covering up clear data that reveals that the mRNA vaccine increases inflammation of the heart arteries”.
The charity said it “categorically” denied the allegations.
The British Medical Journal published a study in May this year which found that heart problems linked to Covid vaccines were “very rare or possibly rare”.
A Lancet study found that patients who had reported suffering from heart inflammation (myocarditis) after a Covid vaccine had “predominantly mild” symptoms and added that “few patients have required intensive treatment”.
Bridgen’s claims that the British Heart Foundation was involved in a conspiracy to cover up the potential harms of taking the Covid vaccine were dismissed by the charity.
A spokesperson told The Times: “The scientific consensus is that the benefits of Covid-19 vaccination, including a reduced risk of severe illness or death, far outweigh the very small risk of rare side effects like myocarditis or pericarditis for the vast majority of people, especially as people get older.
“Scientific evidence shows that Covid-19 itself is much more likely to cause myocarditis than the vaccine is, and people who are vaccinated have a much lower risk of getting other serious complications caused by Covid-19.
READ MORE: Female MSPs 'considering action over Tories' misogynistic behaviour'
“We employ a small leadership team of senior scientists and cardiologists to oversee and administer our research funding programmes, who also continue to undertake some of their own research. We can categorically say that nobody within this leadership team has acted in the way claimed by Mr Bridgen.”
During his Westminster Hall debate on “vaccine harms” on December 13, Bridgen said: “It has also been brought to my attention by a whistleblower from a very reliable source that one of these institutions is covering up clear data that reveals that the mRNA vaccine increases inflammation of the heart arteries.
“It is covering this up for fear that it may lose funding from the pharmaceutical industry.
“The lead of that cardiology research department has a prominent leadership role with the British Heart Foundation, and I am disappointed to say that he has sent out non-disclosure agreements to his research team to ensure that this important data never sees the light of day. That is an absolute disgrace.”
READ MORE: Aberdeen University alumnus gives unbelievable University Challenge answer
Bridgen has tweeted consistently in the past month about the potential harms of Covid vaccines.
Most recently, he said: “By suppressing the evidence of the harms caused by the mRNA vaccines the [mainstream media] have sealed their own fate.
“The public will never believe anything from them again. It’s the end of these mouthpieces of big Pharma and the super wealthy elite. This is the end of the controlled media.”
Bridgen was suspended from parliament for five days before Christmas after the Commons’ sleaze watchdog found he had committed a number of “very cavalier” breaches of lobbying rules.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel