KING Charles has sparked debate and criticism after he referenced the cost of living crisis in his Christmas broadcast – just days after rejecting the idea of a “cut-price coronation”.
The monarch – who took over from Queen Elizabeth upon her death in September – will be formally crowned on May 6, 2023. A source linked to the Operation Golden Orb committee, which plans the ceremony, told the Sun that costs could run to more than £100 million.
Charles was accused of having "badly misjudged the national mood" in the wake of reports that he had rejected the idea of having a cheaper ceremony, with similar accusations springing up after his Christmas Day speech.
READ MORE: Backlash in Scotland against King's plans to name new 'Duchess of Edinburgh'
Speaking on December 25 from what he called the “exquisite chapel of Saint George at Windsor Castle”, the king referenced “those at home finding ways to pay their bills to keep their families fed and warm” and paying “tribute to all those wonderfully kind people who so generously give food or donations”.
He noted that many people were going through "great anxiety and hardship", sparking an angry response in some quarters.
“If Charles cared so much for the homeless and hungry we're sure he'd rush to open the hundreds of empty rooms of his palaces to house them and dip into his £millions to feed them. He won't, because he doesn't,” campaign group Our Republic wrote.
Majority of country didn’t see it and won’t. A lot will watch and pay little attention. The patronising idea that we need glib sentiments from a man ripping off the taxpayer and failing to live up to basic standards of public life is nonsense. #NotMyKing https://t.co/DwfVOPaJYe
— Republic (@RepublicStaff) December 25, 2022
Scottish Tory councillor Thomas Kerr praised the King’s speech, claiming it was “exactly what the country needed”, but was largely mocked.
The UK-wide campaign anti-monarchy campaign group Republic responded to Kerr: “Majority of the country didn’t see it and won’t. A lot will watch and pay little attention. The patronising idea that we need glib sentiments from a man ripping off the taxpayer and failing to live up to basic standards of public life is nonsense.”
READ MORE: King Charles refuses 'cut-price coronation' in favour of pomp and glamour
NUS Scotland president Ellie Gomersall wrote of the King’s address: “How dare Charles Mountbatten-Windsor speak of the cost of living crisis mere days after demanding our money be spent on his pompous coronation.
“People across the UK are suffering in poverty while he sits on unimaginable wealth. He has no idea.”
How dare Charles Mountbatten-Windsor speak of the cost-of-living crisis mere days after demanding our money be spent on his pompous coronation. People across the UK are suffering in poverty while he sits on unimaginable wealth. He has no idea. https://t.co/Ca3RHyazZi
— Ellie Gomersall 🍉 is on annual leave until 9/1 (@elliebgomersall) December 25, 2022
And Plaid Cymru’s Brandon Ham echoed the sentiment, writing: “How dare he claim to sympathise with those struggling to feed their families and heat their homes, just days after demanding more money be spent on his pompous coronation.”
Many others also pointed to the fact that Charles did not pay any inheritance tax – which would have been levied at 40% on anything over £325,000 for anyone else – even on the private estates passed down to him by the former Queen.
However, Charles was also celebrated by some who saw his references to the “selfless dedication” of public sector workers as being tacitly supportive of the widespread strike action across the UK.
The King said that “our health and social care professionals, our teachers, and indeed all those working in public service whose skill and commitment are at the heart of our communities”.
Satirist Jolyon Rubinstein commented on Twitter: “Seeing a #kingsspeech that championed social capital, public sector workers and those who give their time is refreshing and clear blue water from this disgusting government. Pay these people what they are worth. Credit where credit is due.”
I swear King Charles in his Christmas speech just hinted the nurses and paramedics deserve a pay rise 😉#KingCharles
— Sangita Myska (@SangitaMyska) December 25, 2022
LBC presenter Sangita Myska wrote: “I swear King Charles in his Christmas speech just hinted the nurses and paramedics deserve a pay rise.”
And the i’s political commentator Paul Waugh added: “I can't be the only one to watch King Charles's speech and think 'ooh, that feels like a very deliberate message about recognising value of NHS staff, inc ambulance workers, on strike?'”
Rail workers employed by the UK Government-owned Network Rail were on strike for the second consecutive day on December 26, impacting on services both north and south of the Border.
NHS workers in England, Wales and Northern Ireland went on strike in the days leading up to Christmas, as did Royal Mail workers. Border Force workers at British airports will be on strike from December 28, alongside some civil servants.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel