THE Prime Minister has been urged to “break with his predecessors” and make scrapping the two-child limit and benefit cap a top priority when Parliament returns in the new year.
The SNP’s women and equalities spokesperson Kirsten Oswald has said the two Tory policies are “unspeakably cruel” and that neither would exist in an independent Scotland under an SNP government.
Latest statistics show that there are around 787,000 households in the UK with three or more children claiming benefits.
Almost half of these are impacted by the cruel two-child cap and "rape clause" policy which means families get no benefits for third and subsequent children.
READ MORE: 'Out of touch' Sunak asks homeless man if he wants to 'get into finance'
A joint report by the Institute for Public Policy Research, Trades Union Congress and Child Poverty Action Group suggested that the two-child limit is the single biggest driver of child poverty.
According to the report, scrapping the two-child cap and benefit cap across the UK would reduce child poverty by 300,000 and lift 500,000 people out of overall poverty.
Commenting, Oswald said that the PM has “made much of his willingness to break with his predecessors and disown key policies which were quite clearly having a disastrous impact”.
She added: “Given the shameful record of successive Tory Prime Ministers on tackling child poverty, he must be prepared to do so again in 2023.
“The Tory two-child limit policy, with its callous rape clause, is the only one of its kind in the world – that speaks volumes.
“Along with the benefit cap, which the Scottish Government will mitigate within its competence, the two policies are unspeakably cruel and must go. Under an SNP government, neither policy would exist in an independent Scotland as we continue to strive for a fairer society."
Oswald continued: “Scrapping them in January could lift half a million people out of poverty before Christmas next year - or hopefully long before then. Both policies are exacerbating child poverty and undermining our efforts in Scotland to tackle it.
“It would also free up money the Scottish Government is using to protect people from the benefit cap in Scotland, which could be used for other things. I am urging Rishi Sunak to perform another Tory U-turn and make abolishing these policies the first thing he does when Parliament returns.”
A Government spokesperson said: “Latest figures show that there were 200,000 fewer children in absolute poverty after housing costs compared to 2019/20. But we recognise that families are struggling with rising prices and our priority will always be to support the most vulnerable, which is why we are protecting millions with at least £1200 of direct payments while our Energy Price Guarantee is saving households £900 on average.
“The two-child policy means families on benefits are asked to make the same financial decisions as families supporting themselves solely through work, including considering our comprehensive childcare offer for working parents and child benefit for all children.
“There are careful exemptions and safeguards in place within the policy to protect people in the most vulnerable circumstances.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel