JEREMY Clarkson’s newspaper column in which he said he ‘hated’ Meghan Markle has become the Independent Press Standards Organisations most complained about article.
It has now received more than 17,500 complaints with the SNP’s Westminster group writing to The Sun saying they are “deeply concerned” by the “hateful” use of language.
The previous most complained-about article was published in the Scottish Sun in August 2020, about the Stonehaven train derailment, which received more than 16,860 complaints
The piece has faced significant backlash, including from the First Minister who said that Clarkson’s words were “deeply misogynist.
The SNP group’s letter follows on from John Nicolson, who had already written to the chief executive of ITV.
It reads: “To print a comparison of the democratically elected First Minister of Scotland to a serial killer is shocking and entirely inappropriate.
READ MORE: Elon Musk: Future policy-related polls only open to Twitter Blue users
“Mr Clarkson’s political views should not be an excuse for engaging in this gratuitous hatred.
“It is no wonder we have fewer women in political life, across all parties, than we ought to, when this kind of narrative is seen as acceptable.”
The graph below shows how the number of complaints received by Ipso about the article has drastically increased since yesterday morning.
The letter continued to say that the piece “should never have been printed” and that his “bile-filled violent rant” rightly led to widespread criticism.
It added: “It is entirely possible to disagree without resorting to the misogyny and violent language Mr Clarkson used.
“The Sun should recognise this, retract this article, and apologise.”
More than 60 MPs have already sent a letter to the newspaper’s editor calling for the piece to be retracted and for an apology to be issued to Markle.
The Sun declined to comment when approached by The National.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel