An SNP MP has written to the chief executive of ITV calling for Jeremy Clarkson to be sacked by the broadcaster.
MP for Ochil and South Perthshire John Nicolson, the SNP’s media spokesperson, posted his letter on social media in which he condemned Clarkson’s “deplorable” comments about both Meghan Markle and Nicola Sturgeon.
The former Top Gear presenter is the current host of Who Wants to Be a Millionaire, which is broadcast on ITV.
His recent article in The Sun, in which he said he is “dreaming of the day” Markle is “paraded naked through the streets of every town in Britain” while having excrement thrown at her, has faced significant backlash.
READ MORE: Jeremy Clarkson should lose every job he has over disgraceful comments
More than 12,000 complaints have been made to Ipso about the piece while the First Minister also slammed Clarkson for his comments.
Nicolson, a former journalist, said that he has “consistently defended freedom of the press” but that this particular article had “crossed a line”.
He said: “Using the names of the democratically elected First Minister of Scotland and the Duchess of Sussex alongside that of a serial killer is grotesque.
Following grotesque comments made about the First Minster and The Duchess of Sussex, I do not believe Jeremy Clarkson should be allowed back on our screens. I've written to the Chief Executive of @ITV. pic.twitter.com/oUnc3OvhKQ
— JOHN NICOLSON M.P. (@MrJohnNicolson) December 19, 2022
“Expressing a scatological, misogynistic fantasy that Meghan Markle might be assaulted with faeces is an insight into a disturbed mind, openly expressing violent hate speech.
“I do not believe that Mr Clarkson should appear on our television screens again. It would be especially inappropriate for him to be used as a presenter by any Public Service Broadcaster.”
The letter continued to say that Nicolson refused to believe Clarkson’s behaviour was in line with ITV’s purpose to “connect with millions of people and inspire positive change”.
Nicolson also commented on Clarkson’s response to the backlash in which he said he had made a “clumsy reference” to a Game of Thrones scene and that he would be “more careful in the future".
The MP added: “I note that Mr Clarkson has responded to public revulsion with a mocking tweet. It’s clear no repentance is likely.
“So I believe there is now considerable public interest in how ITV responds.”
ITV has been contacted for comment.
This comes as more than 60 MPs have written to the editor of The Sun to condemn the piece as the group demanded that the publication take action against Clarkson.
“We are horrified at the recent article by Jeremy Clarkson in your publication. As parliamentarians of every persuasion, we condemn in the strongest possible terms the violent misogynistic language", the letter read.
It continued: “This sort of language has no place in our country, and it is unacceptable that it was allowed to be published in a mainstream newspaper. Ms Markle has faced multiple credible threats to her life, requiring the intervention of the Metropolitan Police.
“Hateful articles like the one written by Mr Clarkson do not exist in a vacuum, and directly contribute to this unacceptable climate of hatred and violence.”
The letter continued: “We are deeply concerned about the role modelling being promoted to young men and boys, that they can verbally attack women without a consequence or that it is OK to use violent language to address a woman that you might disagree with.
I welcome Jeremy Clarkson's acknowledgement that he has caused hurt #notanapology- but an editorial process allowed his column to be printed unchallenged pic.twitter.com/pFhdSGn071
— Caroline Nokes MP (@carolinenokes) December 20, 2022
“You will no doubt know how violence against women and girls has surged across Britain in recent years. We must do better. Enough is enough. We cannot allow this type of behaviour to go unchecked any longer.
“We welcome The Sun’s retraction of the article, we now demand action is taken against Mr Clarkson and an unreserved apology is issued to Ms Markle immediately.
“We further demand definitive action is taken to ensure no article like this is ever published again.”
The letter was signed by a total of 64 MPs.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel