ELON Musk has vowed to abide by the results of a poll he posted asking Twitter users if he should “step down” as head of the social media platform.
Musk tweeted the 12-hour poll at 11.20pm on Sunday night. "Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll”, he tweeted along with the options “Yes” or “No”.
The poll attracted more than four million votes within an hour of posting and had ballooned to 12.5 million as of 6am, with 56% of votes in favour of Musk stepping aside.
That figure currently sits at 57%. In a series of separate tweets, he said there was “no successor” in line to take over if the poll returns a “Yes” result.
Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 18, 2022
He wrote: “The question is not finding a CEO, the question is finding a CEO who can keep Twitter alive.
“No one wants the job who can actually keep Twitter alive. There is no successor.
“As the saying goes, be careful what you wish, as you might get it.”
Earlier, Musk announced a U-turn on a new policy which banned users from promoting certain rival social media websites, including Facebook, Instagram and Mastodon.
He wrote on Twitter the policy would be “adjusted” to only suspending accounts “when that account’s *primary* purpose is promotion of competitors”, adding: “Going forward, there will be a vote for major policy changes. My apologies. Won’t happen again.”
That initial announcement was the latest move by Musk to crack down on certain speech after he shut down a Twitter account last week that was tracking the flights of his private jet.
READ MORE: Glasgow tech sector expanding ‘at rapid rate’ with £100m investment
Recently, he also came under fire from officials in Brussels for booting a series of journalists covering the billionaire off the platform.
The National also spoke with a scientist who slammed Musk's tweet about infectious disease official Anthony Fauci.
European Commissioner Vera Jourova said that the suspensions were “worrying” and that EU law protects media freedom.
Many of those accounts were later restored following an online poll by Musk.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel