VIEWERS have questioned Laura Kuenssberg’s decision not to discuss an article written by Jeremy Clarkson about Meghan Markle on her Sunday morning BBC show.
The former Top Gear presenter has been heavily criticised for a "vile" opinion piece on the Duchess of Sussex.
Writing in The Sun, Clarkson said he lies in bed “grinding his teeth and dreaming of the day when she [Markle] is made to parade naked through the streets of every town in Britain while the crowds chant, ‘Shame!’ and throw lumps of excrement at her”.
It comes following the release of a Netflix series where the couple detailed their relationship with the royal family.
The Sun’s editor Victoria Newton appeared on the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg where she was asked about a series of front pages reporting Prince Harry and Markle want an “apology” over the way they have been treated.
READ MORE: Year of Tory chaos smashes 'natural party of government' myth
However, Kuenssberg did not ask any of the panel about Clarkson’s piece, which has been described on social media as “vicious” and “misogynistic”.
One user said: “Is Laura Kuenssberg not going to ask about the violently misogynistic attack on Meghan Markle?”
Upon posting the list of guests appearing on Sunday’s show, many urged the broadcaster to “please ask” about the article while another said the article was an “outstandingly vicious and hateful” piece.
Joining #BBCLauraK this weekend:
— BBC Politics (@BBCPolitics) December 17, 2022
Cabinet minister Oliver Dowden
Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper
Orion program manager Howard Hu
Archbishop Justin Welby
Broadcaster Susanna Reid
Sun editor Victoria Newton
Sunday 9am @BBCOne and @BBCiPlayer https://t.co/nzGYDNZEhM pic.twitter.com/HPoEAtyTMz
Asked about reports of a “conspiracy” against the couple by Buckingham Palace and the media, Newton said this did not stack up.
“We had lots of dealings with the press officers at the time for Harry and Meghan and in particular I remember some of my dealings with them going back to when they were still in the family”, she said.
Newton added: “Never once was I given a negative story about other members of the royal family to look after William and Kate for example.
“A lot of the time we were given more positive stories about Harry and Meghan from the royal story officially.”
She continued: “The idea that we were always favouring William and Kate or the other royals over them is just simply not true.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel