A NEW report shows the UK Government is exacerbating humanitarian crises around the world after cutting international aid spending and missing funding deadlines, the SNP have said.
The International Rescue Committee (IRC) published its annual Emergency Watchlist report this week which identifies the 20 countries at greatest risk of humanitarian crises next year.
It is anticipated Somalia, Ethiopia and Afghanistan will face the most severe crises, while the list also includes countries like Yemen, Haiti, and Ukraine.
The findings also show many of the “guardrails” protecting crises-affected communities from catastrophe have been weakened, allowing conflict, climate change, and economic turmoil to overload humanitarian systems.
Despite this, the UK Government has refused to reinstate the target of 0.7% of Gross National Income (GNI) on international development.
It was ditched in November 2020 by Rishi Sunak – who was chancellor at the time – making the UK the only G7 country to cut foreign aid spending during the Covid pandemic.
READ MORE: Central Scotland sees amber weather warning amid heavy snow
If the Tories had kept their manifesto commitment to spend 0.7% of GNI, the Official Development Assistance would have been £4.6 billion bigger.
The UK Government has missed successive deadlines for funding to international programmes, including the Green Climate Fund and Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.
In addition, International Development Minister Andrew Mitchell said earlier this month 30% cuts to bilateral programmes were expected as “open ended” costs ate into the aid budget.
The SNP are now calling for the 0.7% targeted to be reinstated to help the world's most vulnerable.
Alyn Smith, the party's Europe and EU Ascension spokesperson, said of the report: “The IRC’s Annual Report demonstrates the need for the UK to take its international development responsibilities seriously.
“The UK was the only G7 country to cut foreign aid during the pandemic. Its routine failure to meet funding deadlines as well as reinstate the 0.7% target means that far too many people in the developing world are suffering the catastrophic effects of the UK Government’s decisions.
“The situation is dire but it is not too late to help many of those most at risk of humanitarian disasters in the coming months.
“The need is all the more pressing as we face a global food crisis, worsening economic headwinds and the increasingly devastating effects of climate change. The UK has the means to help those who need it most and it is a damning indictment of its current state of affairs that it is failing to do so.
“Scotland will continue to play its part as a good global citizen in the world where it can but it is only with independence that we can take a far more effective and different course towards helping the world’s most vulnerable people, at home and abroad.
“The papers we published earlier this year show that the SNP is not short of ideas, and we would urge the FCDO [Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office] to take our recommendations seriously.”
The report follows findings from the UN that 2023 will see a record 339 million people in need of aid - a 24% increase from 2022.
The UK was described as an “unreliable partner” by the UK director at STOPAIDS after it missed the deadline to donate to the Global Fund to Fight Aids in October.
It was also reported in October that the tropical disease snail fever had returned to Zanzibar after being eliminated following UK aid cuts.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here