THE opponents of independence thought that they had achieved a milestone victory with last month's Supreme Court ruling, which found that the Scottish Parliament does not have the legal right to hold an independence referendum.
They must be thinking again now.
A new poll from the traditionally No-friendly YouGov became the fourth in a row to give a lead to independence. Every single poll since the court handed down its ruling has shown a rise in support for independence and put support for independence in the lead over opposition to it. One poll can be dismissed as a statistical blip … four in a row points to a real change happening in public opinion.
Whoever could have thought it? People in Scotland don't like being told by judges sitting in London that they cannot determine Scotland's future for themselves, and they certainly don't like being lied to by generations of British politicians who have always insisted that the people of Scotland have the right to choose Scotland's future, only for them to wheech away that right the moment that the people of Scotland have decided they want to exercise it.
It's not the judges who have lied to Scotland – it's those British nationalist politicians who have always asserted that Scotland is a member of a voluntary Union and Scotland's people have the right to determine Scotland's future, even as they put in place a legislative framework which denied Scotland that right and ensured the claim that the United Kingdom is a voluntary Union is as meaningless and deceptive as Gordie Broon's "read the small print" Vow.
All the polls also confirm a pattern which has been evident for a long time. It is only among the oldest cohort of voters that there is consistently majority opposition to independence. Younger voters opt for independence by a significant margin, and among 20-year-olds and 30-year-olds and the youngest voters, support for independence is overwhelming.
READ MORE: What should the SNP’s MPs do at Westminster?
Given this well-established pattern, combined with the rise in support for independence following a ruling which establishes that in the eyes of the British state it's not up to the people of Scotland to decide Scotland's future for themselves, an intelligent and thoughtful British politician would understand that simply saying “No” to another referendum is merely a short-term tactic which is unsustainable in the longer term. Moreover, it is a tactic which if continued indefinitely more or less guarantees Scottish independence.
The intelligent British strategy therefore should be to facilitate an independence referendum as quickly as possible, while there is still a realistic chance that the opponents of independence could win it and long before the shifting sands of Scottish demography make support for independence the settled and unarguable will of the people of Scotland.
But, of course, we all know that they won't do this. Westminster is ruled by short-termism. It always has been and always will be. It is written into the very foundations of the Westminster system, which is predicated on the principle of the absolute sovereignty of Parliament – a doctrine which means that no government can bind the hands of its successors.
All any Prime Minister needs to do is kick the can down the road long enough so that the entire thorny question becomes a matter for his or her successor and they are off the hook. And who knows … in the meantime, something might turn up, some SNP-bad story might succeed in doing what none of the many others in the constant barrage of SNP-bad stories over the years have succeeded in doing and put support for independence into substantial decline.
So what we will get is more “muddling through”. We will get more British politicians insisting that the UK really is a voluntary Union despite all evidence to the contrary, and refusing to explain what the democratic route to another independence referendum might be in order to maintain the tattered fiction of a voluntary Union until, like a game of pass the crap parcel, the nasty question can be fobbed off to someone else.
In this travesty of Scottish democracy, they will be aided and abetted by a Scottish media that tries to downplay, ignore, or discredit the warnings given by the polls.
But with every poll that shows a majority for independence, we get closer to the music stopping for good.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel